Intel Raptor Lake is now also available in notebooks: the HX variant with up to 32 threads and 5.6 GHz is extremely fast if required. With generous power limits in thick (gaming) notebooks, it is even enough to dig the water out of an AMD Ryzen 9 7900X desktop processor in places. The basis for this: the desktop die.
Table of contents
In the 13th gen, HX stands for up to 24 cores
Raptor Lake and Alder Lake in one series
Up to 157 watts and more
The test samples from MSI and XMG at a glance
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI with Core i9-13950HX
XMG Neo 16 (E23) with Core i7-13700HX
Special features of the test samples
Power limits: Up to 140 watts permanently
Performance
Conclusion
In the 13th gen, HX stands for up to 24 cores
The three large models of the new HX series are unique because only they offer the full configuration with 8 P- + 16 E cores. In addition, there is a significantly higher clock in peaks – these are exactly the parameters for which the real Raptor Lake also stand in the desktop.
Raptor Lake and Alder Lake in a series
Ultimately, this is not surprising, since this is the same processor die as the Intel Core i9-13900K (test), just optimized for mobile use on a BGA package with a slightly adjusted V/F curve . The rest of the platform also moves to an updated level, as the block diagram reveals.
As the fourth CPU in the group, the Core i7-13850HX also relies on the new large desktop die, which is a “real” Raptor Lake, because its 12 E-Cores would not be possible otherwise.
The two smaller Core i7s and the three Core i5s, on the other hand, increase less than their predecessors, if there was one at all, because Intel does not follow every existing HX processor with a new one. The assumption, which has not been finally confirmed by Intel, is that in this case it is not a heavily trimmed Raptor Lake die with 8+16 cores that is used, but the old Alder Lake die of the last generation, which is now significantly better on the basis of the better production creates higher clock rates. This is also supported by the fact that only the four large CPUs now support DDR5-5600, while the smaller ones remain at DDR5-4800 – as was the case with Alder Lake in the 12th gen.
13th HX Processors Close Up (Image: Intel)
Up to 157 watts and more
The power limits in the notebook are lower than in the desktop, even if Intel's official specification of PL1 = 55 and PL2 = 157 watts is not dated OEM must be carried. For example, the MSI Titan GT77 HX sets PL1 = 150 watts and PL2 = 220 watts in the top performance profiles. That comes pretty close to many desktop processors – not exactly the flagships there, but at least the second row.
< figure class="gallery__figure"> Intel Core i9-13950HX at 150 to 220 watts
Figure 1 of 4
Under load on all threads, 200 watts is no problem Only the silent mode brings 55 watts Only the silent mode brings 55 watts – but for PL1 and PL2
Speaking of predecessors: a year ago, slightly fewer models were sold. The differences to the predecessor are very clear in places, but sometimes only very small. Overall, the HX series has taken a step forward in terms of performance, as the overview shows.
Intel and MSI have provided the Titan GT77 with the current version of one of their flagships. However, the test configuration with a Core i9-13950HX paired with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 will not be available in retail, MSI is going “all in” with the flagship and is relying on the even larger Core i9-13980HX. Alternatively, there is a number smaller – but then directly with the CPU and GPU. The MSI page gives an overview of the specifications, including for smaller models.
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13V (Image: MSI)
Intel and MSI emphasize the cooling of the new notebook as a special feature. It consists of four fans, eight heat pipes and many outlets, so that heated air can be discharged quickly. This also works quite well in the test, but the volume is still high under full load.
The cooler in the MSI GT77 with Raptor Lake-HX (Image: MSI)
XMG Neo 16 (E23) with Core i7-13700HX
Schenker launched the Raptor -Lake-HX family provided an XMG Neo 16 (E23) with “new” Core i7-13700HX, which offers 8 P and 8 E cores and is probably based on the same die as the 12th generation core. PL1 (TDP) = PL2 can be increased to up to 160 watts via the Control Center.
XMG Neo 16 E23 with Core i9 (Picture: XMG)
Special features of the test samples
On the CPU side, the MSI notebook does what it should, and the new Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 also shows what it can do in a separate test. However, the BIOS seems extremely rudimentary, for example the working memory cannot be shaken, and there is also no trace of an overclocking function.
However, the RAM only works with DDR5-4000 ex works, while Intel advertises the CPU with support for DDR5-5600, just as it can be used almost anywhere on the desktop. However, the solution to the riddle has been known since Alder Lake: If there are four DIMM slots, DDR5-4000 is officially the end, even if there are only two bars in the system. When fully equipped with four banks and two DIMMs per channel, which the notebook also offers, the clock can only be DDR5-3600 in the worst case (PDF document, page 96).
With a full RAM configuration, an HX processor can only run DDR5-3600/4000 (Image: Intel) < /figure>
Image 1 of 7
Intel XTU reads details like DDR5-4000 Intel guide for testing with DDR5-4000 (image: Intel) MSI BIOS 1 MSI BIOS 2 MSI BIOS 3 MSI BIOS 4
Schenker, in turn, informed the editors about a potential problem with the CPU performance of the early pre-production sample of the XMG Neo 16 (E23). However, the editorial sample was not affected, as the results will show.
Power limits: up to 140 watts permanently
< p class="p text-width">The MSI notebook sets new boundaries. The 200 watt mark quickly falls in applications without any problems – of course not permanently, but load peaks in this area are normal. Under constant load, the cooling still manages to dissipate 130 to 140 watts – a new record in the editorial office, which explains why the CPU from the notebook ends up close to a 13900K from the desktop, which has been limited to 125 watts.
Package Power (Blender, BMW) 04080120160200Watt (W) 1102030405060708090100110120130140150
Intel Core i9-13950HX (55/55 W)
Intel Core i9-13950HX (150/220 W)
Intel Core i9-12900HX (86/157 W )
Intel Core i9-12900HX (65/157 W)
Intel Core i7-13700HX (140W)
Intel Core i7-13700HX (45W)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (35/80 W)
The Core i7-13700HX in the XMG Neo 16 can consume not quite as much, but still considerably more than 55 watts PL1. Over a longer load, the consumption levels off at around 100 watts of power consumption and is right in the middle of the performance of a Core i9-12900K with 88 or 125 watts. Technically, the models are almost identical. Primarily, the same number of cores counts, there are minimal clock differences to the detriment of the newcomer.
The clock rates, which are ultimately responsible for the performance, are extremely interesting. Here the two HX generations quickly separate worlds in everyday life – thanks to the power limit, especially when it acts much more openly at the top. At 55 watts, however, the CPU cannot jump over its shadow and the clock rates drop accordingly. The same is the case in green at 45 watts.
Clock of the E-Cores (Blender, BMW) 01.0002.0003.0004.000MHz 15101520253035404550556065707580859095100105109
Intel Core i9-13950HX (55/55 W)
Intel Core i9-13950HX (150/220W)
Intel Core i9-12900HX (86/157W)
Intel Core i9-12900HX (65/157 W)
Intel Core i7-13700HX (140W)
Intel Core i7-13700HX (45W)
Performance
The same chip + the same power loss = the same performance, that's how easily the performance of the mobile HX CPUs can be described on the basis of the chips known from the desktop. On top of that, the MSI offers superior notebook performance with Intel Core i9-13950HX that has never come close to a true flagship desktop processor. But the Core i7-13700HX with a permanent 100 watts has no problem with the previous model, the Core i9-12900HX – the old Core i7 line is even more clearly distanced.
Ryzen 9 6900HS (35/80W = ~70W) Asus ROG Zephyrus G1428
Core i7-11700K DDR4-2933CL1428
Core i7-11700K (125/250 W) DDR4-2933CL1427
Core i7-11700 (2933G1) DDR4-2933CL1427
Core i9-9900KS DDR4-2666CL1427
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X DDR4-2666CL1427
Core i9-9900X DDR4-2400CL1427
Ryzen 7 3800XT DDR4-3200CL1427
Core i7-11800H (120 W) XMG Neo 1526
Core i9-7900X DDR4- 2400CL1426
Ryzen 5 7600X (45W) DDR5-5200CL3226
Core i5-13400F (65W) DDR5-4800CL3826
Core i7-10700K DDR4-2666CL1426
Ryzen 7 3800X DDR4-3200CL1426
Ryzen 7 5800H (80 W ) XMG Core 1526
Core i9-9900K DDR4-2666CL1425
Core i9-9900KS (127/159W) DDR4-2666CL1425
Ryzen 7 3700X DDR4-3200CL1425
Ryzen 9 6900HS (45 Watts) Asus ROG Zephyrus G1425
Ryzen 9 5980HS (80 W) Asus ROG Flow X1325
Core i7-13700HX (45 W) XMG Neo 16 (E23)24
Ryzen 7 4750G Pro DDR4-3200CL1424
Ryzen 5 5600X DDR4-3200CL1424
Core i9-11900KB (65/109 W) DDR4-3200CL1424
Ryzen 5 7600 (45W) DDR5-5200CL3224
Core i7-12700H (35/60W) XMG Neo 1524
Core i9-9900K (95/119 W) DDR4-2666CL1424
Ryzen 9 6900HS (35W) Asus ROG Zephyrus G1423
Core i9-11980HK (95/200 W) DDR4- 3200CL1423
Core i7-12700H (45W) XMG Neo 1523
Core i5-12500 DDR4-3200CL1423< /li>
Core i5-12500 (65/117 W) DDR4-3200CL1422
Ryzen 5 5600G DDR4-3200CL1422
Core i7-9800X DDR4-2400CL1422
Core i5-12400 DDR4-3200CL1422
Core i5-12400 (65/117 W) DDR4-3200CL1422
Core i5-11600K (125/250 LT) DDR4-3200CL1422
Ryzen 7 2700X DDR4-2933CL1422
Ryzen 5 5500 DDR4-3200CL1421
Ryzen 9 4900HS (35W) Asus ROG Strix G1421
Ryzen 9 4900HS21
Core i5-11600K DDR4-3200CL1421
Core i7-11700 (65/224 W) DDR4-2933CL1421
Ryzen 5 3600XT DDR4-3200CL1420
Core i5-11400F DDR4-2933CL1420
Ryzen 5 3600X DDR4-3200CL1420
Core i7-10875H (62W) Aero 15 OLED20
Core i7-10700 (65/225 W) DDR4-2666CL1420
Ryzen 5 3600 DDR4-3200CL1419
Core i5-10600K DDR4-2933CL1419
Core i7-9700 DDR4-2666CL1419
Core i5-10600K (125/182 W) DDR4-2933CL1419
Ryzen 7 1800X DDR4-2666CL1419
Core i9-9980HK (65/95 W) Intel Whitebook19
Ryzen 5 4650G Pro DDR4-3200CL1419
Ryzen 7 2700 DDR4-2933CL1419
Core i7-11800H (45 W) XMG Neo 1518
Core i7-11800H (35/60 W ) XMG Neo 1518
Core i7-8700K DDR4-2666CL1418
Core i7-10875H (45W) Aero 15 OLED17
Core i9-11980HK (30/200 W) DDR4-3200CL1417
Core i5-10400F DDR4-2666CL1417
Core i5-11400F (65 /154 W) DDR4-2933CL1417
Ryzen 7 1700 DDR4-2666CL1417
Core i5-10400F (65/134 W) DDR4-2666CL1417
Ryzen 5 2600X DDR4-2933CL1417
Core i7-9700 (65/81 W) DDR4-2666CL1416
Core i3-12100F (58/89 W) DDR4-3200CL1416< /li>
Core i3-12100F DDR4-3200CL1416
Ryzen 5 2600 DDR4-2933CL1415
Ryzen 5 1600X DDR4-2666CL1415
Ryzen 3 3300X DDR4-3200CL1414
< li class="chart__row chart__row--hidden toggle-body-item nojs-tr">Core i7-10710U Intel NUC13
Core i5-9400F DDR4-2666CL1413
Ryzen 3 3100 DDR4-3200CL1413
Core i7-7700K DDR4-2400CL1412
Ryzen 3 4350G Pro DDR4-3200CL1412
Core i5-8400 DDR4-2666CL1412
Core i3-10100F (65/90 W) DDR4-2666CL1412
Ryzen 5 3400G DDR4-3200CL1411
Ryzen 5 2400G DDR4 -2933CL1410
Core i7-4770K DDR3-16009
Core i3-9100F DDR4-2666CL149
Ryzen 3 3200G DDR4-3200CL148
Core i7-2600K DDR3-13337
Ryzen 3 2200G DDR4-2933CL147
Core i7-1065G7 (15 W) Acer Swift 37
Core i5-10210U Asus PN627
Core i7-10510U (10W) Asus ExpertBook B9450FA6
Athlon 3000G DDR4-2666CL145
Athlon 240GE DDR4-2666CL145
li>
Pentium Gold 5400 DDR4-2400CL145
Athlon 200GE DDR4-2666CL144
Ryzen 3 3200U Zotac Zbox4
Unit: percent
The single-core performance of Intel processors is very well known and nothing of it is lost in the notebook either. The desktop only wins here because it can clock even higher. In the end it doesn't matter which power limit is applied here.
With With the Core i9 of the HX series, Intel with Raptor Lake is once again raising the bar in the 13th generation of notebooks. With the right power limits, the full configuration of the CPU can do almost exactly what is known from the desktop, and thus raises the performance level in the notebook to a new level.
The performance of the Core i9-13950HX as the “second fastest” model is extremely high with the corresponding power limit and cooling system, as offered by the MSI Titan GT77. To be on a par with an AMD Ryzen 9 7900X as a real top-class player shows this clearly. And the Core i9-13980HX achieves a spark more with an additional 100 MHz clock – assuming there is enough electrical power.
But even the smaller test person does not have to hide. With a correspondingly increased power limit, the new Core i7-13700HX in the Schenker notebook performs as well as a Core i7-12700K from the desktop – one of the recommendations from last year in this area. This also only applies to similar power limits, but it doesn't hurt here, because the newcomer here is more or less an Alder Lake refresh.
Introduced last summer, Intel's HX series with the “desktop CPU in the notebook” approach will soon face competition for the first time. AMD will also pack desktop chips into a BGA package in the new Ryzen 7045HX series and will soon be launching the first notebooks on the market. Then there will also be notebook CPUs from AMD with up to 32 threads that offer 16 Zen 4 cores instead of 8 P and 16 E cores. There, too, the power limits will decide how close the mobile offshoots come to the desktop variants. More details will be available shortly.
ComputerBase was loaned the MSI Titan GT77 HX from Intel and the XMG Neo 16 (E23) from Schenker Technologies for testing under the NDA provided. The only requirement was the earliest possible publication date. The manufacturer did not influence the test report, there was no obligation to publish it.
This article was interesting, helpful or both? The Editors are happy about any support from ComputerBase Pro and disabled ad blockers. More about ads on ComputerBase.