On the potential of e-fuels and on the possibility; to be able to use them in order to extend the use of endothermic engines in a period in which they talk about their future retirement, there is much discussion about it. However, Transport & amp; Environment that already for some time he had criticized their usefulness, once again underlining this aspect. This time, however, it does so by bringing the data of a research carried out directly by the oil industry, carried out by Concawe.
According to what Transport & amp; Environment, the research highlights that in 2035 , the year in which the sale of new endothermic vehicles is to be banned, e-fuels will be able to power up to 2% of all the cars present on European roads.
SOLUTION FOR A FEW
Therefore, for Transport & amp; Environment, the production of e-fuel will be; still beginning as of 2035. Thus, only 5 million cars out of an estimated total of 287 million could run fully on synthetic fuels by this date. For T & amp; E, e-fuels are just a ploy by oil companies and car manufacturers to delay the transition to zero-emission technologies.
In short, T & amp; E points the finger at those who want to ask for a derogation on the abandonment of combustion engines as long as these models use e-fuel. Joann Gimbert , analyst at T & amp; E, said:
E-fuels are presented as a way to extend the life of combustion engine technology. But industry data shows there will be enough fuel for only a small fraction of the cars on the road. Lawmakers should close the doors to this ploy of the fossil fuel industry.
But it is not; over here, as Transport & amp; Environment adds that if we want to consider only e-fuels produced with renewable energy , then the number of cars they could power would be much more; low of the 5 million mentioned above.
In Europe, synthetic fuels for cars would absorb electricity. renewable energy needed for the rest of the economy. & Egrave; It is also naive to think that developing countries, some of which lack energy for basic needs, can give up their renewable energy to dedicate it to the e-fuels of European cars, just to satisfy the interests of engine manufacturers. Synthetic fuels produced in Europe should have priority; for airplanes and ships, most of which can not & ograve; use batteries to decarbonise.
T & amp; E said that the industry's plans to import e-fuels on a large scale are unrealistic since production facilities and global standards for certifying synthetic fuels do not exist. Furthermore, synthetic fuels are also a much less ecological solution for cars than electric cars. According to claims, an electric car will emit by 2030; 53% less CO2 in its life cycle compared to a car powered by e-fuel.
Add to this that using e-fuel in cars will not eliminate; the toxic emissions of one of the major sources of atmospheric pollution. Last year, T & amp; E points out, laboratory tests showed that a car using synthetic fuels emitted as many NOx emissions as a car with traditional fuels would.
best Xiaomi for photos without 5G? Redmi Note 10 Pro, buy it at the best price from Amazon Marketplace at 221 euros .