AllInfo

“Shut up”: National profile and SD top in fierce pedophile row

Published December 27, 2024 at 01.21

Domestic. SD refuses to fire a municipal employee who helped a Syrian child rapist wipe away his sperm after his crime – despite the man being convicted of protecting a criminal. Instead, the party wants to pay a quarter of a million kronor to the pedophile in a parachute, which makes Örebro Party's Markus Allard see red.
 “What about keeping your mouth shut?” he writes to SD leader Martin Kinnunen.

Share the article

TwittraShare

Örebro Party

  • Swedish X: Better Örebro Party than SD
  • "We will eradicate the scum": National profile wants to challenge SD – at the national level
  • S-kommun received criticism – then a requirement for "good atmosphere" in the council is introduced
  • Here 64 politicians are left speechless when they are held accountable for IS schools
  • LGBTQ certification is questioned – then the Liberal politician starts "crying".

Markus Allard, host of the SD channel Riks and party leader of the populist Örebro Party, launches a renewed attack on the Sweden Democrats.

In an infected row on Platform X, he criticizes the party for ensuring that a daycare center employee in Örebro who helped a Syrian child rapist hide his crime receives a parachute from the municipality.

The municipality is giving the man eight months' salary, which is equivalent to 230,000 kronor – a decision that is eagerly defended by the SD.

The fact that the SD chose to give the pedophile “severance pay” instead of firing him has raised questions and has been reported by SVT, among others. Not least because the man is forced to leave his job due to a crime, as he was convicted of protecting a criminal, and under such circumstances it is normally possible to fire a person without severance pay.

Markus Allard accuses the SD of rewarding a “paedophile protector” and fundamentally questions the party's willingness to act for real social change.

“Wipe up the sperm”
“According to the SD, you have to reward paedophile protectors with a quarter of a million in a parachute for not violating the Swedish Penal Code. The guy wiped up the sperm after his colleague raped a four-year-old,” he writes, calling it “insane” that the employee was not fired outright.

Martin Kinnunen, SD member of parliament, responds by dismissing the criticism and accusing Allard of behaving like a “random emotionally driven woke politician”.

“Crimes are normally not grounds for dismissal,” writes Kinnunen, arguing that the law must be followed in such cases. He adds that it would be better to “tighten the punishment and give the police new powers” than to focus on labor law details. “Or you can get likes on Twitter by posting about how it works in all workplaces in the country,” continues Kinnunen. Allard gets support from lawyers.Allard responds to this with further posts in which he refers to several lawyers, including a prosecutor, who agree with him that there was grounds for dismissal without compensation.

The conflict escalated when Allard directly urged Kinnunen to “shut up”.

“And you're calling ME frivolous? How about waiting a bit, reading up and shutting up in the meantime? Or maybe shutting up altogether considering that you're making it so difficult for yourself?” he writes.

“What the hell are they doing?”
In a recent interview with Fria Tider, Allard attacked the SD and accused them of being false populists who are actually most interested in “getting into the heat” and “becoming part of the fray”. He is now repeating that criticism in the war of words on X.

It is telling of the SD's attitude towards politics that several of them “reflexively” end up in a defensive position of the S-C-M municipality's buyout of “pedophile protectors”, he notes.

The SD is very keen to be “brotherly good” even in cases where they don't even need to be, according to Markus Allard. The Riks profile further asks “what the hell are they doing with their 40 percent share of the government's budget”.

“Undeserved” populist role
The SD has received the populist role for free “by being treated unfairly (unfair partly because they did not deserve to be treated as if they were like the Örebro Party, but also unfairly towards us who actually want to go further than the SD in terms of cleaning up Sweden's corrupt swamp)”, writes Markus Allard.

“SD stands together with the other eight-leaf clovers and complains about our tone, our rhetoric and how we spread a bad atmosphere in the city council,” he states, expressing a frustration he has long felt about how he has seen SD act in municipal politics. Martin Kinnunen, for his part, defends himself by saying that he has never commented on the law but has only pointed out that it is stupid to “get on a high horse without providing any deeper information.” The row has received a lot of attention on the platform and has aroused strong reactions, and many accuse SD of taking a passive stance against what they see as unacceptable behavior. Several also express surprise that Martin Kinnunen and SD choose to take such a strong stand against Allard and the Örebro Party on this particular issue.

Posted

in

by

admin

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply