Trans shooter's manifesto kept secret: “Copyright”

Published 28 August 2024 at 12.21

Domestic. A manifesto written by Nashville school killer Audrey Hale will not be released to the public — citing that the copyright now belongs to the victims' families. A judge has decided that, reports the New York Post. However, that the school shooter wanted to “kill little whites” has already been revealed by a previous leak.

Share the article

TwittraShare

The school massacre in Nashville

h2>

  • School killer transvestite wanted to "kill little whites"
  • FBI refuses to release trans shooter's manifesto: "Astronomically dangerous"
  • Female transvestite behind mass murder at Christian school in USA

Audrey Hale, who “identified” as male, killed six people (including three children) at the Christian Covenant School last year. She was herself shot dead by the police during the incident.

The school killer left behind a series of writings that have been classified – something that has caused a lot of speculation.

Audrey Hale's parents have transferred the copyright to the writings – including 20 diaries, a “memoir” and a suicide note – to the victims' relatives.

The judge justified the decision to seal the documents with the fact that copyright gives the families the right to control who gets access to Audrey Hale's texts.

Interest in the manifesto has been great as it is believed to be able to provide insight into Audrey Hale's motives. Some speculate that she may have harbored a hatred of the school's Christian profile, having previously been a student there.

From previously leaked texts it appears that she wanted to “kill little whites” – which she did by murdering three white nine-year-olds.

But the judge also highlighted the risk that the manifesto could inspire others to similar acts of violence as a decisive factor in keeping it secret.

The decision has been met with relief by some of the victims' families, who see it as a way to prevent Audrey Hale from getting the attention she sought. At the same time, several groups, including the media and rights organizations, have criticized the decision and claim that it threatens the transparency of the legal system.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply