The Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 is a 45-inch OLED monitor with 240 Hz and HDMI 2.1 in 21:9 format. The highlight: the user can bend the display himself so that it can be used flat or curved. The concept works in the test and the image quality and speed of the OLED panel are outstanding.
Table of contents
- 45-inch OLED can be bent
- Burn-in guaranteed< /li>
- Bend OLED until it cracks
- Hands off the display
- No visible marks
- Specifications and experiences
- 45 inch with UWQHD and 240 Hz
- Matte OLED panel with 10 bit
- Black is black
- Brightness depends on the proportion of white
- 0.03 ms response time
- DP 1.4, HDMI 2.1 and USB-C
- Anti-burn techniques
- No height adjustment, only tilt
- No RGB lighting
- Good OSD, spongy joystick
- Power consumption
- Brightness and color fidelity
- Almost 1,000 cd/m² in HDR with little white
- Measurement of color fidelity
- Display and input lag (beta)
- Input lag
- Display lag
< li>Conclusion
45-inch OLED can be bent
The Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED is Corsair's fourth monitor that lives up to its name. Because the display is based on a flexible OLED panel from LG Display, so that the screen can be used both flat and curved with a radius of 0.8 m. The model has side handles with which the user can bend the display himself. Depending on the game, you can choose the right mode, because strategy titles are usually played with a flat monitor, but racing games or flight simulators with a curved one. Aside from gaming, many prefer a flat monitor. With the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 you should no longer have to decide for one of the two by simply bending it to fit. The display itself measures an impressive 45 inches in 21:9 format with UWQHD resolution of 3,440 × 1,440 pixels, offers a variable refresh rate of up to 240 Hz and, typical of OLEDs, has perfect contrast and fast response times.
< p class="p text-width">This size and specifications come at a price. Because the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED starts today for 2,399 euros in advance. It should be delivered to early pre-orderers later this year. In addition to the monitor and stand, the manufacturer includes all the necessary video cables, specifically for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1 and USB-C to USB-C. All cables are 1.5 m long. A USB-C to USB-A cable for data connection to a desktop PC without USB-C and the external 240 watt power supply are also included.
Back of the flat Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with handles retracted
Back of curved Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with extended handlesWith a guarantee against “burn-in”
Corsair grants a three-year warranty on the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED. In addition, the display comes with a zero-burn-in and zero-dead-pixel guarantee for a period of three years – if it has a bright pixel or more than six dark pixels, the manufacturer will exchange it just like with one Image burn-in off.
With the Xeneon 32QHD165 (test), Corsair already has one of the gaming classics still favored by many, a monitor with a 32-inch IPS panel, up to 165 Hz and the WQHD resolution of 2,560 × 1,440 pixels. The Xeneon 32QHD240 increases the data to 240 Hz. The Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (test), on the other hand, relies on the UHD resolution of 3,840 × 2,160 pixels at 32 inches as well as a variable refresh rate of up to 144 Hz and HDMI 2.1 for gamers.
OLED bend until it cracks
As a user, you only notice that the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED has a flexible OLED display when you extend the side handles on the screen and pull the display on both sides towards you from the front. Then it curves. If the user wants to achieve the maximum curvature of 800 R, he has to bend the monitor until it cracks. The cracking comes from the mechanism on the back of the screen and signals the endpoints in either direction. The handles can then be retracted again so that they are no longer visible from the front. They snap in both positions and are unlocked with a button on the outside.
However, the monitor not only knows maximum bending and a flat display, but you can also adjust it to a curvature in between. However, it is not always easy to bend both sides exactly the same way. In principle, both sides of the screen can be bent independently of each other. If desired, only one side of the display can be curved, but the other left straight. So if you want to set up a monitor setup consisting of three Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240, you can bend the outer edges of the two outer models, but leave the rest straight.
Bending back to the flat position is exactly the opposite. The monitor tends to tilt backwards over the base, since the screen is relatively light at around 3.5 kg and does not have a heavy base. The basic rule is to bend the display as straight as possible from the front so as not to tilt it.
Image comparison: Handles for bending the Corsair Xeneon Flex 40 -
Back of the curved Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with the handles retracted
Image 1 of 5
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 bending mechanism
Hands off the display
It is important to note that when bending the display, you only touch the handles, but do not support yourself with your thumbs or palms on the OLED panel. It's best to press your thumbs against the top of the handle to avoid damaging the monitor by applying excessive pressure to the panel.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 review
Curved Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with extended handles
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240No visible tracks
ComputerBase often bent the OLED display back and forth in the test. There were no visible traces left on the screen. Corsair states that the OLED panel has a virtually unlimited flex life. The mechanism is designed to withstand 10,000 to 15,000 flex cycles. If you bend the monitor five times a day and every day throughout the year, the monitor will last at least 5.5 to 8.2 years. However, a test cannot simulate how the mechanism performs over the long term in everyday use.
Technical data and experiences
< h3 class="text-width text-h3" id="section_45_inches_with_uwqhd_and_240_hz">45 inches with UWQHD and 240 Hz
As already mentioned, the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 uses a 45-inch OLED display (RWBG) in 21:9 format with a UWQHD resolution of 3,440 × 1,440 pixels. The visible area is 1,047.5 × 441.3 mm. With a pixel density of 84 ppi, the screen is even below a 24-inch Full HD monitor, which has 92 ppi.
The variable refresh rate reaches up to 240 Hz, which is an enormous improvement in everyday life under Windows, but above all, of course, when playing games. The minimum refresh rate is 40 Hz, below that LFC is used, so a range from 40 to 240 Hz is covered. The monitor not only supports FreeSync Premium, but is also Nvidia G-Sync compatible. It therefore dispenses with a G-Sync module, which fortunately also saves the fan on the module, but with Nvidia graphics cards it can also synchronize the graphics card and display to effectively prevent the image from being torn. Both technologies showed no abnormalities in the test, and tearing and stuttering were successfully eliminated with both AMD and Nvidia.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240Matte OLED panel with 10 bit
The OLED panel with an anti-reflective coating offers true 10-bit color depth. The matte coating convinces in the test by not allowing surrounding light sources to become a disruptive factor. Corsair specifies the color space coverage as 100 percent sRGB, 98.5 percent DCI-P3 and 96.3 percent Adobe RGB. The viewing angles of the display are 178 degrees.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Black is black
The high contrast ratio, which Corsair specifies at 1,350,000:1, is typical of OLED technology. Real black is made possible by completely switching off individual pixels, because the black areas of OLED displays no longer shine down to the pixel, while with LCDs the backlight still shines through and black continues to shine slightly.
There are therefore no problems with local dimming with too few zones with OLED displays. As an IPS display, the Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144, for example, has local dimming with 16 zones and the AOC Porsche Design Agon Pro PD32M (test) has 1,152 zones. In both cases, switching the backlight on and off in unfavorable situations is clearly visible and annoying. The Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED does not have such problems.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240Brightness dependent on white part
With the Xeneon Flex, the brightness of the OLED display depends on how much of the screen area is illuminated and how large the proportion of white is. If the entire screen is illuminated in white, Corsair specifies a brightness of 150 cd/m² for the entire display. If 25% of the screen is white, the manufacturer specifies the peak brightness as 450 cd/m². At 10% and using HDR, up to 800 cd/m² should be achieved and at 3 percent (HDR) up to 1,000 cd/m². According to the company, a new HDR classification (HDR rating) to match this is in the works.
The test shows that the change from small, bright areas to large, bright areas then reveals the strong fluctuations in brightness that are typical for this. Going from a small, bright white square to an all-white background, the difference is striking, with the white appearing dark and gray. Depending on the intended use and image content, this circumstance is more or less annoying. In everyday life, it is usually not noticeable, since such extreme changes almost never occur. If you still want to prevent this harsh change, you can activate a “Brightness Stabilizer” in the on-screen display of the monitor. This ensures that the maximum brightness remains low, so that the difference between “completely white” and “small area white” is not that great. So you permanently reduce the maximum brightness.
-
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Image 1 of 2
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD2400.03 ms response time
When it comes to response times, OLEDs again have a clear advantage over the comparatively sluggish liquid crystal displays. At least on paper, the Corsair Xeneon Flex achieves new best values with only 0.03 ms when switching between grayscale (GtG). Even the fastest LCDs don't get below 0.5 ms. The latency when switching a pixel on or off is said to be just 0.01 ms.
DP 1.4, HDMI 2.1 and USB-C< /h3>
For the video connections, Corsair relies on a DisplayPort 1.4, two HDMI 2.1 and a USB-C port with DP alt mode. Connected devices such as notebooks can also be charged with up to 30 watts via the USB-C interface. This is a sufficient value for many work devices in everyday use if they are not put under too much strain. Several devices, such as a gaming PC and a games console via HDMI 2.1 and a notebook via USB-C, can be connected and switched to the Corsair Xeneon Flex without any problems. The monitor also offers Picture in Picture and Picture by Picture, so that theoretically several signal sources can be shown on the display at the same time. The OSD is used to set which signal is to be displayed where. Anyone who wants to switch between two PCs while working without having to switch the signal every time is also served. The test subject is addressed with 10 bits and pixel format 4:4:4 at full resolution and 240 Hz both via DisplayPort 1.4 and via HDMI 2.1.
Connections of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 240 watt external power supply
Connections of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 ReviewThere is also a USB-C upstream port for connecting to the PC and four USB-A downstream ports, two of which are located in the front of the stand and are therefore easily accessible from the front. All four ports offer a maximum of 5 Gbit/s (USB 3.1 Gen 1). A headphone output is also routed to the front. The Xeneon again does not have internal speakers.
Also on the front of the stand, Corsair has the on/off switch, a switch for selecting the video input and the 5- Placed path joystick for OSD.
Techniques against burn-in
A “burn-in prevention system” is intended to counteract the risk of “burning in” of static image content that is prevalent with OLEDs. This consists of two techniques: the “Image Retention Refresh” and the “Orbit Refresh”. The former is the technology known from OLED televisions, which “refreshes” the pixels when the display is switched off. This process is always performed after eight hours of use when switched off and is also visible by a blinking of the monitor's status LED. The screen itself remains black. As with TVs, don't unplug the monitor immediately when you turn it off to avoid interrupting this process. The process takes almost five minutes. If desired, the process can also be started manually via the OSD. In the OSD it is also possible to switch “Orbit Refresh” on and off. When enabled, the image will be shifted one pixel every minute in a clockwise circular motion. The function is switched on ex works.
No height adjustment, only tilt
Corsair uses a completely different model for the base than for the first two monitors. The wide base is firmly connected to the screen, only the V-shaped base has to be screwed on. The wide Xeneon Flex only supports tilting the display by -7 and 15 degrees, for which a handle is mounted in the middle at the bottom of the screen. The display cannot be swiveled or adjusted in height. The latter in particular is not always optimal – even if the standard height setting of the monitor is well chosen for the tester, this does not necessarily apply to everyone. Pivot is not supported given the size. The Xeneon Flex also lacks the extras familiar from other gaming screens from Corsair, such as a 1/4-inch thread, to which a camera, microphone or lamp can be attached, for example.
-
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Image 1 of 4
> Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
No RGB lighting
On a RGB -Lighting or logo projection, as they are used by many current gaming monitors, Corsair also does without their third display.
Good OSD, spongy joystick
The on-screen display (OSD) and its operation are again well implemented in the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240. Corsair once again commendably relies on a 5-way joystick, which, as mentioned, is placed on the front of the stand. However, it is a bit too spongy, so that occasionally a wrong action is triggered. In particular, when you want to press it to get to the OSD, you often call up one of the shortcuts that are on the right or left. In the OSD, the user can primarily choose from different color presets and activate gaming functions such as a crosshair or overlay of the refresh rate. However, OLED displays do not offer options for overdrive.
Another good solution is that switching on and off is not done via the joystick, but via a separate button. This now also applies to the input button, which allows a direct change of the input signal.
-
OSD of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED
Image 1 of 18
< /figure>
>

OSD of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED
Anyone who does not want to use the OSD will also be able to change all the settings via a connected PC if it is connected to the monitor via the USB uplink and the current iCUE software is installed. Will, because this connection is not yet working and the software needs to be updated first. The update for the iCUE software is planned to be provided in the first quarter of 2023. Firmware updates for the Xeneon can then also be imported via the software.
The new model should also offer Stream Deck integration, which was also not yet available in the test. They can be used to assign buttons for switching OSD settings directly on the Stream Deck.
Power consumption
The power supply of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 delivers a maximum of 240 watts, of which around 30 watts are reserved for power delivery via USB-C. The power consumption of an OLED monitor is much more dependent on what is displayed than an LCD monitor, as black areas are completely switched off, thus significantly reducing consumption.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240In the standard test procedure with Windows desktop and full brightness as well as 240 Hz refresh rate, the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 estimates 89 watts. If, instead of the blue background image, you choose a full-surface black background, which is only illuminated by the taskbar and around 20 desktop icons, the power consumption with otherwise the same settings is only 28 watts and thus significantly below conventional IPS displays despite the enormous size , which usually consume around 60 watts here.
Brightness and color-fidelity
The brightness and color fidelity measurements were carried out in the “Standard” picture mode and with the “Default” color temperature setting, since this combination delivers the highest brightness values. The color temperature of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 is 8375 K in this mode, so it is very cool. In the “Standard” color temperature mode, it is 6,390 K, which is close to the optimal 6,500 K. On “Warm” it's tuned very warm indeed at 4920K.
-
Homogeneity of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Image 1 of 45
Homogeneity of the Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (SDR)
Homogeneity of the Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (HDR)
Homogeneity of the AOC Agon Pro PD32M (SDR)
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic VP3256- 4K
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic VP3268a-4K in Native mode
Homogeneity of the Alienware AW3423DW
AOC Agon AG324UX homogeneity
Uniformity of the Philips Momentum 329M1 in sRGB mode
Uniformity of the Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 in sRGB mode
Uniformity of the Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 in Standard mode
Uniformity of the MSI Modern MD271QPDE< /figure>
Homogeneity of the Huawei MateView
Homogeneity of the MSI Optix MAG301RF
Homogeneity of the MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR
Homogeneity of the MSI MAG274QRFDE-QD
Homogeneity of the AOC Agon AG273QZ with Gamma 1
Homogeneity of the AOC Agon AG273QZ with Gamma 2
Homogeneity of the MSI Optix MAG272CQR
Homogeneity of the LG 27GL850-B
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic XG270QG
Homogeneity of the Lenovo Qreator 27
Homogeneity of the Philips Momentum 278M1R
Uniformity of the Dell UltraSharp U3219Q
Homogeneity of the Eizo EV3285
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic VX3211-4K
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic XG3220
Homogeneity of the MSI Optix MAG274RDE
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic XG270
Homogeneity of the Samsung C27RG50
Homogeneity of the Eizo FlexScan EV2760
Homogeneity of the Dell P2720DC
Homogeneity of the Samsung C32HG70
Homogeneity of the BenQ EX3203R
Homogeneity of the ViewSonic XG3240C
Homogeneity of the LG 32GK850F at SDR
Homogeneity of the LG 38GL950G
Homogeneity of the Samsung C49RG90 with local dimming enabled
Homogeneity of the Samsung C49RG90 with disabled Local Dimming
Homogeneity of the Philips 499P9H
Homogeneity of the LG 49WL95C
Homogeneity of the Dell U4919DWAlmost 1,000 cd/m² in HDR with little white
As stated by Corsair itself, the brightness depends heavily on the amount of white in the image. With a full-surface display of a white image, the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 achieves 155 cd/m² in the center of the image and 145 cd/m² in the darkest area (left center) in SDR. The 150 cd/m² specified by the manufacturer for this case is therefore also achieved in practice.
The homogeneity of the OLED display is excellent, especially since no backlight is used must, which can shine with different brightness.
If you reduce the white component, the monitor also achieves higher brightness. Corsair states 450 cd/m² for 25% white content, 800 cd/m² for 10% and 1,000 cd/m² for 3%.
A peak of 283 cd/m² is achieved at 50%, 432 cd/m² instead of the 450 cd/m² specified by Corsair at 25%, ComputerBase measures 766 cd/m² at 10% and 955 cd/m² at 2% reached. ComputerBase was able to test two firmware versions, with the v101a firmware, which arrived shortly before the test was published, increasing the brightness to these high values.
The Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 is also completely free of problems such as backlight bleeding, which classic monitors have to struggle with again and again, thanks to the display technology used.
In the Display of black does not light up the screen. The measured brightness is 0 cd/m² everywhere. The black level is therefore perfect, which also ensures excellent contrast without halo effects.
At minimum brightness, the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 shines with a minimum of 31 cd/m² (top right) and a maximum of 35.8 cd/m² (center of the image) in the full-surface display of white – very good, if not outstanding values.
Measurement of color fidelity
ComputerBase tests the color reproduction of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with Portrait Displays' Calman Color Calibration software. It compares the color displayed on the monitor with the color displayed by the program. The average and maximum DeltaE value and the DeltaE 2000 diagram are particularly interesting at this point, as they indicate how much the color reproduction deviates from the selected color standard. A deviation of 1 dE is almost invisible to the human eye. A calibrated display should be set so that the average deviation is less than 3dE and the maximum dE is less than 5. A deviation of more than 3 dB is considered visible to the human eye. Uncalibrated monitors are usually well above that. The Delta E 2000 diagram shows the deviation for each measured color value.
The CIE 1976 chart shown for the 45WQHD240 shows which color points are from the desired color value. With an optimally adjusted display, all points should be within the squares.
-
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 ColorMatch test result in Standard mode
image 1 of 95
ColorMatch test result of Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 in sRGB mode
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 ColorMatch test result in Creative mode
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 ColorMatch test result in Game mode
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 ColorMatch test result in Movie mode
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 ColorMatch test result in Text mode
Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 ColorMatch test result in sRGB mode with color matching
ColorMatch- Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 test result in sRGB mode
Corsair Xeneon ColorMatch test result 32UHD144 in Standardmode
ColorMatch test result of AOC Porsche Design Agon Pro PD32M in sRGB mode< figure class="thumbs__figure thumbs__figure--has-caption">
ViewSonic VP3256-4K ColorMatch test result in sRGB mode
ViewSonic VP3256-4K ColorMatch test result in Native mode
ViewSonic VP3268a-4K ColorMatch test result in sRGB mode
ColorMatch test result of ViewSonic VP3268a-4K in Custom mode
ColorMatch test result of Alienware AW3423DW in Creator mode
ColorMatch test result of Alienware AW3423DW in Standard mode
ColorMatch test result of AOC Agon AG324UX in sRGB mode
ColorMatch test result of AOC Agon AG324UX in Standard mode
ColorMatch test result of Philips Momentum 329M1 in sRGB mode
ColorMatch test result of Philips Momentum 329M1 in 6500K mode
Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 ColorMatch test result in sRGB mode
Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 ColorMatch test result in Standard mode
Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 ColorMatch test result in Creative mode
ColorMatch test result of MSI Modern MD271QPDE
ColorMatch test result of MateView in mode sRGB
ColorMatch test result of MateView in Native mode< figure class="thumbs__figure thumbs__figure--has-caption">
MSI Optix MAG301RF ColorMatch test result
ColorMatch test result of MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR in sRGB mode
ColorMatch test result of MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR in User mode
MSI MAG274QRFDE-QD color match test result
Color fidelity of the AOC Agon AG273QZ in HCFR
ColorMatch test result of MSI Optix MAG272CQR in User mode
ColorMatch test result of MSI Optix MAG272CQR in HDR mode
Color fidelity of the LG 27GL850-B
ViewSonic XG270QG ColorMatch test result
ColorMatch test result of the ViewSonic XG270QG with minimal adjustments
ColorMatch- Lenovo Qreator 27 Test Results in Custom Mode
CIE-1976- Chart of the Philips Momentum 278M1R
Color fidelity of the AOC U32U1 in sRGB mode
Color fidelity of the AOC U32U1 in delivery condition
ColorMatch test result of the Eizo EV3285
Color fidelity of the MSI Optix MAG274RDE in HCFR
Dell PC2720DC ColorMatch test result
Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD – sRGB
Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD – Standard
ColorMatch test result of the LG 38GL950G in the sRGB profile< /figure>
ColorMatch test result of LG 38GL950G in profile Gamer1
ViewSonic XG240R ColorMatch test result – sRGB mode
ViewSonic XG240R ColorMatch Test Result – Native Mode
ViewSonic XG2530 – Native Profile
ViewSonic XG2530 – sRGB profile
LG 27GK750F
ColorMatch test result of ViewSonic VX3258-2KC in sRGB mode
ColorMatch test result of the ViewSonic XG3240C
ColorMatch test result of the LG 32GK850F with sRGB
Samsung C32HG70 ColorMatch test results
ColorMatch test result of BenQ EX3203R in sRGB mode
ViewSonic VX3211-4K ColorMatch test result – sRGB mode
Asus PG27UQ – ColorMatch test result
ColorMatch test result of LG 32GK850F with Gamer 1 and Gamma Mode 3
ColorMatch -Samsung C32HG70 test results
Samsung C32HG70 ColorMatch test results
Asus XG35VQ
Asus XG35VQ
V Qus XG3
Asus XG35VQ – readjusted
ViewSonic XG3220 – sRGB Profile
ViewSonic XG3220 – sRGB Profile
ViewSonic XG3220 – sRGB profile
ViewSonic XG3220 – sRGB profile adjusted< /figure>
ViewSonic XG3220 – ColorX Profile
ViewSonic XG3220 ColorX Profile
ViewSonic XG3220 ColorX Profile
LG 27GK750F
LG 27GK750F
LG 27GK750F
ViewSonic XG2530 – sRGB Profile
ViewSonic-XG2530 – sRGB Profile
ViewSonic XG2530 – sRGB profile
ViewSonic XG2530 – Native Profile
ViewSonic XG2530 Native Profile
ViewSonic XG2530 Native Profile
BenQ XL2730
BenQ XL2730
BenQ XL2730
HP EliteDisplay E240
HP EliteDisplay E240
HP EliteDisplay E240
Dell U2312HM
Dell U2312HM
Dell U2312HMWith an average color deviation of 2.2 dE and a maximum color deviation of 4.4 dE in the “Standard” preset with color temperature “Default”, the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 is within the desired limits of 3 dE and 5 dE. The color rendering is therefore very good.
The sRGB mode surprisingly achieves worse values in the test with 3.0 dE and 5.3 dE. In practice, it is therefore advisable to adjust the brightness of the standard mode instead of choosing the sRGB mode. Theoretically, further adjustments can also be made via the OSD, not only to the color temperature, but also to the color balance for R, G and B.
The other presets such as “Game”, “Text”, “Creative” and “Movie” all offer poorer color fidelity, although the highest possible color fidelity is not their declared goal, depending on the preset.
Display and input lag (beta)
The introduced display and input lag measurements are still in the beta stage and ComputerBase asks you to understand them as such, since both measurement methods have advantages and disadvantages. In addition, many factors in the display settings affect the result, which still needs to be analyzed in more detail. In particular, they are to be understood as a comparison of the screens under the same test conditions instead of as absolute measured values. The fastest display setting (“Response Time” or “Overdrive”) in the OSD is always selected for the measurements, unless otherwise stated in the diagrams.
Input lag
ComputerBase, on the other hand, measures the input lag with the help of a modified mouse with an LED soldered to its switch in order to be able to visually analyze the delay between pressing the button and perceptible implementation on the display. This measurement is also not to be regarded as an absolute value, since the input lag depends on the components used in the PC and the evaluation also includes tolerances. In this case, too, the aim is to enable a comparison among tested monitors rather than to determine a generally valid absolute value. Displays with only a very small difference should be considered equal due to the unavoidable measurement tolerances. While the monitors all have to be operated with 60 Hz but deactivated V-Sync due to the method used for the display lag, the maximum refresh rate of the screen with deactivated V-Sync is used when measuring the input lag.
Input-Lag
-
- Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD24037,43
- Lenovo Qreator 27 (Level 4)37,50
- BenQ EX3203R38,54
- ViewSonic XG270QG (Ultra Fast)38.54
- LG 38GL950G (Fast)38.54
- ViewSonic XG3240C38, 88
- MSI MAG274QRFDE-QD (Fastest)38.90
- LG 32GK850F39.16
- MSI MAG274QRFDE-QD (normal)39.50
- Asus ROG Strix XG35VQ (OverDrive 5)39.58
- ViewSonic VX3258-2KC (Ultra Fast/Low Input Lag on)39.58
- Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 (Fastest)40,20
- AOC Agon AG273QZ (Medium)40,28
- AOC Agon AG273QZ (Strong)40.28
- MSI Optix MAG272CQR (Fastest)40.63
- LG 38GL950G (Off)40, 63
- Samsung S24F356FH41,17
- ViewSonic XG240R (Fastest)41.20
- ViewSonic XG240R (Standard)41.60
- Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 (Fast)41,60
- MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR (Fast)41,62
- MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR (Fastest)41, 62
- MSI Optix MAG301RF (Fast)41.63
- MSI Optix MAG301RF (Fast)41.65
- Philips Momentum 329M1 (Fastest)41.66
- Dell U4919DW (Fast)41.67
- Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD (Picture Quality)41.67
- MSI Optix MAG272CQR (Normal)41,67
- Philips Momentum 278M1R (off)41,67
- Lenovo Qreator 27 (off)41, 67
- Lenovo Qreator 27 (Level 2)41.67
- LG 27GL850-B (Fast)42.70
< li class="chart__row">Dell P2720DC (Fast)42.71
- AOC Agon AG273QZ (Off)43,06
- Acer Predator X38 (Normal)43,06
- Acer Predator X38 (Extreme)43, 06
- Acer Predator X38 (OC)43,06
- ViewSonic XG253043,75
- ViewSonic VX3258-2KC (Standard/Low Input Lag on)43.75
- ViewSonic XG270QG (Standard)43.75
- LG 27GL850- B (Off)43.75
- Dell P2720DC (Normal)43.75
- ViewSonic VP3268a-4K (Ultra Fast)44.40
- MSI MAG274R (Fastest)44.44
- MSI Modern MD271QP (Extreme)44.44
- ViewSonic VX3211-4K44.79
- Dell U4919DW (normal)44.79
- Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD (Speed)45.01
- LG OLED 48CX (Game)45.80
- ViewSonic XG270 (Fastest)45.83
- MSI Modern MD271QP (Normal)45.83
- Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (Fastest)45.83
- Dell U3219Q (Fast)46.67
- AOC Agon AG324UX (Strong)47,20
- MSI MAG274R (Fast)47,22
- Philips Momentum 278M1R (Faster)47.22
- Philips Momentum 329M1 (Off)48.32
- Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (Normal )48,60
- ViewSonic VX3258-2KC (Standard/Low Input Lag off)50.00
- AOC Agon AG324UX (Off)50.00
- ViewSonic VP3268a -4K (typical)50.69
- ViewSonic VP3256-4K (typical)50.69
- ViewSonic XG270 (typical)51.04
- Alienware AW3423DW51.39
- Samsung C27RG50 (Fastest)52.08
- ViewSonic VP3256 -4K (Ultra Fast)52.78
- AOC Porsche Design Agon Pro PD32M (Strong)56.20
- Samsung C27RG50 (Faster)57.29
- Eizo EV3285 (Standard)60 ,42
- AOC Porsche Design Agon Pro PD32M (Off)62.50
- Eizo FlexScan EV2760 (Enhanced)64.58
- Huawei MateView64.58
- AOC U32U1 (strong)65.20
- AOC U32U1 (off) 66.60
- ViewSonic XG322066.70
- Eizo FlexScan EV2760 (Standard)67.70
- Eizo EV3285 (Enhanced)77.50
- LG OLED 48CX (Filmmaker)136.00
li>
Unit: milliseconds
It is well known that OLED displays are potentially fast. However, the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 proves it impressively. With the best image quality, it takes the lead in the test field with an input lag of less than 37.5 ms.
As already mentioned, it is not possible to adjust the response time in the monitor settings.
Display-Lag
With the display lag, the pure delay caused by the image processing and output of the monitor is considered. It is to be distinguished from the input lag, i.e. the delay before an input is perceptibly implemented on the screen. ComputerBase measures the display lag with the so-called CRT method, in which an analogue CRT aka tube monitor serves as the basis and reference value and the output from numerous photos with a very short shutter speed is compared using a precise millisecond counter on the CRT and LCD. In practice, it must be said that these measurements should only be considered as approximate values, which do not always have to represent the actual value. Because the test conditions are always the same, they enable a good comparison of different tested monitors with one another, which is why some displays that have already been tested and those that will be included in the test in the future serve as a comparison.
Display-Lag
-
- Samsung S24F356FH0,00
- Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD2400.41
- ViewSonic VX3258-2KC (Standard/Low Input Lag on)0.50
- ViewSonic VX3258-2KC (Ultra Fast/Low Input Lag on)0.50
- ViewSonic XG240R (Standard)0.72
- AOC Agon AG273QZ (Medium)0.83
- AOC Agon AG324UX (Strong)0.89
- Asus ROG Strix XG35VQ (OverDrive 5)1.01
- Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 (Fastest)1.05
- ViewSonic XG270QG (Ultra Fast)1, 18
- AOC Porsche Design Agon Pro PD32M (Strong)1.18
- Acer Predator X38 (Extreme)1.19
- ViewSonic XG270 (Fastest) 1.21
- Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 (Fast)1.33
- Acer Predator X38 (Normal)1.35
< li class="chart__row">Alienware AW3423DW1,37
- AOC Porsche Design Agon Pro PD32M (Off)1,39
- Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (Fastest)1.39
- LG 38GL950G (Fast)1.40
- Huawei MateView1,41
- Philips Momentum 329M1 (Fastest)1,43
- AOC Agon AG324UX (Off )1.46
- Corsair Xeneon 32UHD144 (Normal)1.47
- Samsung C27RG50 (Fastest)1.53
- LG 27GL850-B (Fast)1.75
- Philips Momentum 329M1 (Off)1.86
- Asus ROG Strix XG35VQ (OverDrive 0)1.90
- LG 32GK850F1.91
- MSI MAG274R (Fastest)2.00
- MSI MAG274QRFDE-QD (Fastest)2.00
- ViewSonic XG3240C2.05
- BenQ EX3203R2, 05
- Lenovo Qreator 27 (level 4)2.07
- Lenovo Qreator 27 (off)2.09
- LG OLED 48CX (Game)2.21
- MSI MAG274R (Fast)2.28
- Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD (Speed)2.57
- MSI MAG274QRFDE-QD (normal)2, 58
- MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR (Fastest)2.62
- Gigabyte Aorus AD27QD (Picture Quality)2.70
- MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR (Fast)3.79
- ViewSonic VP3256-4K (Ultra Fast)5.24
- ViewSonic VP3268a-4K (Ultra Fast)5.85
- ViewSonic VP3256-4K (Standard)7.50
- Dell U3219Q (Fast) 9.16
- ViewSonic VP3268a-4K (typical)10.40
- Dell U3219Q (typical)12.22
- Philips Momentum 278M1R (Faster)14.83
- ViewSonic VX3258-2KC (Standard/Low Input Lag off)17.00
- ViewSonic XG253017,24
- ViewSonic VX3211-4K19.95
- Eizo FlexScan EV2760 (Enhanced)20.00
- MSI Optix MAG301RF (Fastest)20.41
- Dell U4919DW (normal)20.75
- MSI Optix MAG301RF ( Almost)20.80
- ViewSonic XG322021.10
- Eizo FlexScan EV2760 (Standard)24.00
- AOC U32U1 (strong)24.29
- AOC U32U1 (off)25.00
- Eizo EV3285 (Standard)29.46
- LG OLED 48CX (Filmmaker)35.00< /li>
- MSI Modern MD271QP (Extreme)38.03
- MSI Modern MD271QP (Normal)45.12
< li class="chart__row">MSI Optix MAG272CQR (Fastest)1.56
< li class="chart__row">Dell P2720DC (Fast)3.00
< li class="chart__row">Philips Momentum 278M1R (off)12.55
< /li>
Unit: milliseconds
The monitor also achieves an excellent result when it comes to display lag. At 0.41 ms, it is not only at the top of the test field, but the delay is virtually non-existent.
Conclusion
The Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 convinces in the test thanks to its OLED display with an excellent image and short delays as well as high maximum brightness. Coupled with a 240Hz variable refresh rate and FreeSync and G-Sync compatible Adaptive Sync support, gamers will be highly satisfied. It doesn't even need the unique selling point of the Xeneon Flex, namely the bendable display, with which the user can choose between a flat and a curved screen. When working, surfing, for a strategy game or for video playback, the Xeneon Flex is simply used flat. However, if more immersion is to be achieved in the game, it is quickly bent – the concept works.
-
Testing the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Image 1 of 10
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 Review
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240There is no question that a motorized mechanism for bending the display would inspire more confidence than bending the screen by hand until it cracks – especially since you always tilt the screen slightly since the base does not have enough weight in relation to the display . However, the test did not find any signs that the mechanism is vulnerable or worn out, but the number of bending processes carried out is simply too small for that. In addition, such a mechanism would further increase the already high price of 2,399 euros. This one in particular will stand between many gamers who like the 21:9 format and the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240.
The matte coating of the OLED display pleases the Test, even if it doesn't make the colors pop out like you could achieve with a reflective monitor. However, the advantages in everyday life clearly outweigh the disadvantages.
-
Handle of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Image 1 of 9
Flat Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with extended handles
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 bending mechanism
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 bending mechanism
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 bending mechanism
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 bending mechanism
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 grip
Handle of the Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
Solid base with bending mechanism on Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240However, the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 once again impressively shows what gamers have been waiting for for a long time but can look forward to at the same time: fast OLED displays with an excellent picture, up-to-date connections and high refresh rates. In the future, such OLED monitors will also be available in normal sizes and aspect ratios. However, it will take a little longer before they are finally cheap and affordable for everyone. With the UltraGear 27GR95QE, LG has announced a 27-inch model with OLED and 240 Hz for next year and Asus is getting involved with the ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM. Corsair should also continue on the path it has taken and release a 27-inch OLED monitor in 16:9 format. If this otherwise relies on the properties of the Xeneon 32QHD165 (test), the manufacturer has the next convincing screen in its range.
-
Rear of the flat Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 with extended handles
Image 1 of 3
Curved Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 rear view
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240: Flat (left) and curved (right) at the same timeThe Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 can be criticized for not being able to be adjusted in height. In addition, 30 watts of power delivery are offered, but performance-hungry notebooks cannot be sufficiently supplied with it under full load. There is no general answer for all players as to whether the image format and the resolution are pleasing. 49-inch monitors with 32:9 format offer more image content with 5,120 × 1,440 pixels and correspond to two 27-inch QHD displays, but can no longer be seen at a glance like the wide 45-inch Xeneon Flex.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 OLED product group monitors, 15.12.2022
ComputerBase has received the Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 on loan under NDA from Corsair for testing. The manufacturer did not influence the test and there was no obligation to publish it. The only requirement was the earliest possible publication date.
This article was interesting, helpful or both? The editors appreciate any support from ComputerBase Pro and disabled ad blockers. More about ads on ComputerBase.