15 years ago, the Thermalright IFX-14 (test) was an absolute monster of a processor cooler. The twin-tower cooler with an additional 80 mm cooler not only set records in terms of cooling performance, but also in terms of weight and dimensions.
Table of contents
- Two towers with additional cooler
- Unchallenged performance
- Conclusion
Two towers with additional cooler
The Thermalright IFX-14 was a particularly spacious twin-tower cooler with dimensions of 161.0 × 146.2 × 124.0 mm (H × W × D) and a weight of 790 grams without fan. If that wasn't enough for you, the HR-10 was a smaller, passive additional cooler for the mainboard, which could be used optionally. Including the heat pipe, it was 112.6 × 163.5 × 134.5 mm in size and weighed 130 grams. For many users, however, this cooler was probably useless: it required a good 12 centimeters of clearance from the back of the processor socket upwards without a mainboard sled, the case or the power supply getting in the way. The HR-10 could therefore not be installed in many cases.
-
Thermalright IFX-14 scope of delivery
Image 1 of 7
Huge Cooling Combo: IFX-14 and HR-10
Konvexe Bodenplatte spaltet die Gemüter
Fan mounting possible in three places
Sandwich fan mode best performing
Unfortunately only rarely fits into the case: IFX-14 with HR-10 additional coolerThe actual IFX-14 could be equipped with up to three fans in 120 or 140 mm format – as usual with Thermalright, these were not included in the scope of delivery of the 70 euro cooler. The IFX-14 dissipated the waste heat from the copper base plate via four 8 mm heat pipes to the two cooling towers, each with 54 aluminum fins. Thermalright made the bottom plate slightly convex, which resulted in better performance on processors with a concave heat spreader, but at the same time had negative effects on flat heat spreaders.
Unrivaled performance
In accordance with the enormous dimensions, the IFX-14 made short work of all other coolers that had been tested by ComputerBase to date. In all three fan combinations, with the Scythe S-Flex SFF21D with 750 rpm, the Papst F2GLL with 1,140 rpm and the Sharkoon Power with 2,100 rpm, the IFX-14 was able to take the lead in the test field. The lead over the other coolers was particularly large at lower speeds, and the double ventilation made it even clearer.
[Fan] Speed
[rpm] load temp
Cores* [°C] Sound pressure
[dB(A)] Thermalright IFX-14
[2 x 120 mm Scythe S-Flex SFF21D] 2x 750 65, 5 30.6 Thermalright IFX-14
[120mm Scythe S-Flex SFF21D] 750 69.0 30.4 Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtr.
[120mm Scythe S-Flex SFF21D] 750 72.25 30.4 Xigmatek HDT-S1283< br>[120mm Scythe S-Flex SFF21D] 750 72.5 30.4 Scythe Mugen Heatsink
[120mm Scythe S-Flex SFF21D] 750 73.5 30.4 Thermalright Ultra-120
[120mm Scythe S-Flex SFF21D] 750 75.75 30.4 Scythe Katana 2
[100mm stock fan] 830 90.5 30.4
Soft to medium configuration [< 40 dB(A)]
[fan] speed
[rpm] load temp.
Cores* [°C] Sound pressure
[dB(A)] Thermalright IFX-14
[120mm-Papst F2GLL] 1150 65.5 31.7 Thermalright Ultra -120 eXtr.
[120mm Pope F2GLL] 1150 67.0 31.6 Xigmatek HDT-S1283
[120mm Pope F2GLL] 1150 67.25 31.2 Scythe Mugen Heatsink
[120mm Pope F2GLL] 1150 68.5 31.4 Zalman CNPS 9700 LED
[110mm Stock Fan] 1250 69.25 33.3 Thermalright Ultra-120
[120mm Pope F2GLL] 1150 70.75 31.6 Zalman CNPS 9500 LED
[92mm Stock Fan] 1400 75.75 32.9 Scythe Katana 2
[100mm Stock Fan] 1550 78 ,5 34,6
Power Configuration [> 40 dB(A)]
[Fan] Speed
[RPM] Load temp.
Cores* [°C] Sound pressure
[dB(A)] Thermalright IFX-14
[120 mm Sharkoon Power] 2100 62.25 49.4 Zalman CNPS 9700 LED
[110mm stock fan] 2250 62.25 49.9 Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtr.
[120mm Sharkoon Power] 2100 62.5 49.2 Xigmatek HDT-S1283
[120mm Sharkoon Power] 2100 63.0 48.8 Scythe Mugen Heatsink
[120mm Sharkoon Power ] 2100 63.75 49.0 Thermalright Ultra-120
[120mm Sharkoon Power] 2100 66.25 49.2 Zalman CNPS 9500 LED
[92mm stock fan] 2250 69.5 47, 1
Conclusion
Given enough space and money, the Thermalright IFX-14 was the best cooler users could buy 15 years ago. The cooling performance was brutal and the workmanship was excellent. Nevertheless, Thermalright had to put up with criticism: The convex base plate could lead to problems with certain processors, the additional cooler was incompatible with many cases and the price of 70 euros without a fan was very high. If none of this bothers you, you won't go far wrong with the Thermalright IFX-14.
In the category “In the test 15 years ago”, the editors have been taking a look at the test archive every Saturday since July 2017. The last 20 articles that appeared in this series are listed below:
- The best Radeon HD 2600 XT were blue
- 249 euros was too much for the Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
- Teufel's elegant 2.1 system with excellent sound
- Arctic Cooling's Accelero S1 was colder than the competition
- Zalman wanted to reinvent himself and failed
- Cooler Masters Cosmos at an astronomical price
- The best multimedia keyboard came from Microsoft
- Sparkles Caliber GeForce 8600 GT ran far apart from the Norm
- Xigmatek was on the way to success with the HDT-S1283
- Movie playback on GPUs from ATi versus Nvidia
- Teufel and Logitech in 5.1 exchange of blows
- Scythe's Katana 2 was the mid-range cooler king
- An almost inaudible gaming PC for 3,100 euros
- Corsair's Voyager GT was the best USB stick for 100 euros
- HD 2000 with RV610 & RV630 convinced more than with R600
- DDR3 celebrated its premiere with the Intel P35 at Asus
- ATi CrossFire was 80 percent ahead – measured in dB(A)
- Halo 2 was a flop on the PC despite Vista
- Router, switch and NAS in one from Asus
< li>Thermalright's Ultra-120 Extreme was the reference
li>
Even more content of this kind and many more reports and anecdotes can be found in the retro corner of the ComputerBase forum.