Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 review: fine-tuning for the multitasking master

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 represents the spearhead in the portfolio of foldable smartphones and, with the current generation, improves in important areas such as display, performance, software and camera. The taskbar in Android 12L in particular is a successful innovation. The price remains very high and the device remains very thick.

Table of Contents

  1. 1 Fine-tuning for the multitasking master
    1. Starting price is as before 1,799 euros
    2. Technical data of the Galaxy Z Fold 4
    3. A smaller, very large smartphone
    4. Xiaomi shows what with disadvantages
    5. Processing at a very high level
    6. Displays with narrower edges
    7. The under-display camera remains poor
    8. Durability cannot be assessed in the test
    9. Very bright OLED displays with 120 Hz
  2. 2 performance and software
    1. Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 from TSMC production
    2. 256 GB of storage for the basic model
    3. Galaxy Z Fold 4 in the benchmark
    4. Performance and throttling under constant load
    5. UFS 3.1, especially fast when reading
    6. < li>Android 12L with One UI 4.1.1

    7. Taskbar makes multitasking much easier
    8. Five years of software support
  3. 3 battery life and camera
    1. The Fold 4 naturally consumes more
    2. Average is worth more with the Fold 4
    3. With intensive use, you can get through the day
    4. Three cameras like in the Galaxy S22
    5. Fold 4 takes good photos day and night
    6. Thanks to the folding mechanism, there are many camera modes
    7. Video mode supports up to 8K24
  4. 4 Conclusion

Around three and a half years ago, Samsung pioneered what was then a completely new product category of foldable smartphones with the first Galaxy Fold. The company learned a lot, especially at the start, but the devices have been further developed since then and have been solid companions since the third generation at the latest, which are even protected against water. The new Galaxy Z Fold 4 continues this evolution and improves on its predecessor in several areas such as design, display, cameras and processor.

>As before, the starting price is 1,799 euros

On the other hand, nothing has changed at the starting price of 1,799 euros, so that the latest iteration is also a luxury model for those who combine smartphone and tablet into one product and want to pay a lot for it. Samsung wants to sell around half a million foldable smartphones in Germany this year.

Technical data of the Galaxy Z Fold 4

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 Software Android 12L Android 11 Inner display 7.6-inch, 2,176 × 1,812, Dynamic AMOLED 2X Infinity Flex, HDR, 120 Hz 7.6-inch, 2,208 × 1,768, Dynamic AMOLED 2X Infinity Flex , HDR, 120 Hz outside 6.2 inch, 2,316 × 904, Super AMOLED, 120 Hz, Gorilla Glass Victus+ 6.2 inch, 2,260 × 832, Super AMOLED, 120 Hz, Gorilla Glass Victus Operation touch, stylus, fingerprint sensor, face scanner SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 660 RAM 12GB LPDDR5 Storage 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.0 256GB/512GB UFS 3.1 Cameras Rear Wide Angle 50MP, f/1.8, Dual Pixel -AF, OIS, 23mm, 85˚ FOV 12MP, f/1.8, Dual Pixel AF, OIS, 26mm, 83˚ FOV Ultra Wide Angle 12MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ FOV Telephoto 10MP, f/2.4, AF, OIS, 70mm, 36˚ FOV 12MP, f/2.4, AF, OIS, 52mm, 45˚ FOV Front 10MP, f/2.2 Inner 4MP, f/1.8, UDC Cellular GPRS/EDGE, HSPA+, LTE Advanced Pro, 5G NSA/SA WLAN/BT Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2, UWB Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5. 2, UWB location A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS Other standards USB-C 3.2 Gen 1, NFC SIM 2 × nano-SIM or 1 × nano-SIM + 1 × eSIM battery 4,400 mAh (permanently installed), wireless Loading Size Unfolded 155.1 × 130.1 × 6.3mm 158.2 × 128.1 × 6.4mm Collapsed 155.1 × 67.1 × 15.8mm 158.2 × 67.1 × 16, 0 mm Protection class IPX8 Weight 263 g 271 g Price 1,799 euros (256 GB)
1,919 euros (512 GB)
2,159 euros (1 TB) 1,799.00 euros (256 GB)
1,899.00 euros ( 512 GB)

A smaller very large smartphone

From the outside, the Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Fold 3 look confusingly similar, even areas such as the camera bezel are already known. However, Samsung has fine-tuned and slightly changed the format of the smartphone, cutting the height from 158.2 to 155.1 mm. When closed, the device is still 67.1 mm wide, but opened it is 130.1 instead of 128.1 mm wide due to a slightly modified hinge. Samsung has reduced the depth of the Fold 4 by an irrelevant 0.1 or 0.2 mm.

The overall depth with the gap remains a disadvantage

IPX8 despite the folding mechanism

The Galaxy Fold has never looked fragile, but that's exactly what it was, especially up to the second generation. Since the Fold 3, the smartphone has had IPX8 protection, which means it is protected against water but not against dust. As a technology enthusiast, you can only take your hat off to the fact that a foldable smartphone with so many moving parts could be made waterproof at all. No other smartphone manufacturer has done anything comparable in this category to date.

Xiaomi shows what is possible with disadvantages

Xiaomi recently showed what would be possible without these robust properties with the particularly thin Mix Fold 2, which measures only 11.2 mm in height when closed and only 5.4 mm per side at the thinnest point when opened. However, the foldable smartphone from Xiaomi comes without water protection and the hinge cannot be locked freely, as the first hands-on videos from China show. With the Fold 4, Samsung offers the foldable device that is better designed for everyday use, but with the Mix Fold 2 it shows where the journey for the Koreans has to go with the coming generations. Subjectively, the Fold 4 has the same dimensions as the Fold 3. The next “Fold 5” would have to be significantly thinner in order to reduce the disadvantages of a foldable smartphone, but retain the stability including IPX8 of the current model, so that the lead over the Chinese competition is maintained can be.

Processing at a very high level

The Fold 4 is once again a well-made smartphone that proves that Samsung hasn't just been building foldable devices since yesterday. Small gaps, high-quality materials and precise workmanship ensure that the 1,800 euros invested are also felt by the buyer. Above all, Samsung has once again done an excellent job with the hinge, since it is neither too easy nor too difficult to move, can be infinitely adjusted and closes with a rich folding noise. Sometimes, however, one wishes for a notch in the frame to be able to grip the two halves better when opening.

Image 1 of 2

The fingerprint sensor is in the power button

Displays with narrower borders

Samsung offers the large glass surface on the back in the colors “Gray Green” (test device), “Beige” and “Phantom Black”. “Burgundy” is also available exclusively in the manufacturer's online shop. The front is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+, which is used to cover the still 6.2-inch screen. The diagonal may not have changed, but the manufacturer has reduced the display edges again, especially to the left towards the hinge, so that there is space for 2,316 × 904 instead of 2,260 × 832 pixels on the OLED panel.

Image 1 of 2

The three colors: gray green (test device), beige and phantom black

Unfolded, the Fold 4 reveals a view of the still 7.6-inch screen , which also has a slightly different resolution of 2,176 × 1,812 instead of 2,208 × 1,768 pixels. A few pixels are missing in height, instead there are more in width. The bezels on the inner display have also been slightly reduced compared to the previous year in order to increase immersion again.

UTG has little to do with glass

The inner screen is protected by a slightly improved version of the “Ultra Thin Glass” (UTG) from the German manufacturer Schott, which, purely in terms of haptic experience, still has little to do with glass from Corning, for example, in normal smartphones. The coating feels more like plastic, and the oleophobic protection doesn't handle streaks as well as a regular smartphone display using real glass.

The under-display camera remains bad

The combination of narrower screen bezels and the second generation under-display camera (UDC) ensures that the view of the huge screen is even less disturbing this year. At first glance, nothing has changed in the key technical data of the UDC with 4 MP and f/1.8 aperture. However, Samsung adjusted the pixel structure of the camera so that it is less directly recognizable. The manufacturer is most likely to succeed in this with dark content. However, as soon as White reaches the “hole”, the camera can still be made out again, albeit in a reduced size compared to Fold 3.

Image 1 of 3

Selfie with rear camera (f/1.8, ISO 320, 1/100s) Download
YouTube with tablet-like split

However, the upgrade of the UDC primarily affects the improved integration into the screen, but not the actual quality of the recordings. It still produces fairly coarse pixel mud and should only be used in exceptional situations given the numerous other cameras available. For example, Xiaomi goes so far that the Mix Fold 2 does not offer a camera on the inside at all. A foldable smartphone does not necessarily need this camera, since selfies can also be taken with the front model in the outer display and with the primary camera. However, Samsung wants to offer a package that is as complete as possible, so that apps such as Duo, Skype and Teams can also be used via the inner display alongside other apps. Incidentally, the preview in the viewfinder looks significantly worse than the final result, since all sorts of algorithms only improve the picture after you press the shutter button.

Not longevity to judge in the test

In the area of ​​the fold, two small T-shaped plastic components protect the open transition to the OLED panel and hinge, as in previous years. It cannot be ruled out that dust and small crumbs will eventually make it into the transmission, but cannot be conclusively assessed in a comparatively short test over two weeks. In the test, the smartphone withstood normal everyday use, stowed in trouser pockets, backpacks and storage compartments in the car, without damage. More than other types of screens, however, the inner display is a magnet for small pieces of lint that collect there throughout the day and always make the screen look a little dirty. The Fold 4 also easily coped with use in drizzle and sweaty work in the gym.

Very bright OLED displays with 120 Hz

The readability of both the inner and the outer screen was very good during the test period, even in bright ambient light, which is mainly due to the high brightness of the displays. Samsung does not come close to the measured values ​​of a Galaxy S22+ or S22 Ultra (test), especially with the flexible panel on the inside, but achieves very good values ​​for this type of device.

Image 1 of 2

Inner display has narrower bezels

As with the current Galaxy S smartphones, a distinction must be made between three operating modes that are offered for both screens. On the one hand, the brightness can be set via manual regulation, which can also be further increased via a manually activated boost. On the other hand, there is the automatic mode, which works in relation to the brightness, which is determined via the ambient light sensor. The highest values ​​are traditionally reserved for this mode, which is also the case with the Fold 4, which in this respect comes to just over 1,000 cd/m² for a white full screen. With a reduced “Average Picture Level”, this value can be increased to up to 1,250 cd/m² (10 percent APL) and even more in certain areas.

Charts

85 entries Display brightness max.

  • Automatic mode 100% APL:
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (outside) (Auto, 10% APL)1,468White point: approx. 6,500
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (outside) (Auto, 20% APL)1,407White point: approx. 6,500
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (inside) ( Auto, 10% APL)1,250White point: approx. 6,500
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (Indoor) (Auto, 20% APL) 1,210White point: approx. 6,600
    • Samsung Galaxy S22+1,182white point: approx. 6,700
    • Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra1,161white point: approx. 6,700
    • Apple iPhone 13 Pro1,063White point: approx. 6,800
    • Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max1,056White point: approx. 6,300
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (outside) (Auto, 100% APL)1,009White point: approx. 6,700
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (Indoor) (Auto, 100% APL)1,004White point: approx. 6,700
    • Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra973White point: approx. 6,700
    • < li class="chart__row chart__row--hidden toggle-body-item nojs-tr">Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra969 white point: approx. 7,300

    • Samsung Galaxy S22911White point: approx. 6,800
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3894White point: approx. 6,600
    • Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra878White point: approx. 7,100
    • Apple iPhone 13 mini858 white point: approx. 6,200
    • Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max854White point: approx. 6,300
    • Apple iPhone 12 Pro842White point: approx. 6,300
    • Google Pixel 6a816 white point: approx. 6,500
    • Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max797White point: approx. 6,900
    • OnePlus 9 Pro787White point: approx. 6,800
    • Asus ROG Phone 6784White point: approx. 7,200
    • Xiaomi Mi 11783White point: approx. 6,900
    • Google Pixel 6 Pro777 white point: approx. 6,500
    • OnePlus 9776 white point: approx. 6,700
    • OnePlus 8 Pro773 white point: approx. 7,400
    • Samsung Galaxy A52 5G772 white point: approx. 6,800
    • Google Pixel 6769 white point: approx. 6,200
    • Qualcomm Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders765White point: approx. 7,200
    • Samsung Galaxy S20763White point: approx. 7,200
    • Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra762White point: approx. 7,200
    • Asus Zenfone 9757 white point: approx. 7,100
    • OnePlus 8T753 white point: approx. 6,800
    • Samsung Galaxy S20+752White point: approx. 7,300
    • Oppo Find X3 Pro745 white point: approx. 7,200
    • Unihertz Titan718 white point: approx. 6,900
    • Google Pixel 4a701 white point: approx. 7,000
    • LG Wing688 white point: approx. 7,200
    • Google Pixel 5687 white point: approx. 6,500
    • Apple iPhone Xr686 white point: approx. 7,000
    • Cat S61672White point: approx. 7,400
    • OnePlus 7T672White point: approx. 7,300
    • Gigaset GX290671White point: approx. 9,800
    • Apple iPhone 11661White point: approx. 6,800
    • Apple iPhone 12653 white point: approx. 6,300
    • Apple iPhone Xs Max644White point: approx. 6,900
    • Apple iPhone 12 mini643White point: approx. 6,300
    • Nothing Phone (1)643White point: approx. 6,100
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 9637 white point: approx. 7,800
    • Motorola Moto G8 Plus634White point: approx. 7,700
    • OnePlus Nord629white point: approx. 7,400
    • Samsung Galaxy S9+624white point: approx. 7,800
    • Samsung Galaxy S9622White point: approx. 7,700
    • Huawei Mate 20 Pro616White point: approx 7,300
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 10+616 white point: about 7,200
    • OnePlus Nord 2610 white point: approx. 7,100
    • OnePlus 6607 white point: approx. 7,900
    • Nokia XR20592 white point: approx. 8,150
    • Motorola Moto G6589White Point: about 8,800
    • OnePlus 7 Pro585White Point: about 7,300
    • LG Velvet575 white point: approx. 7,800
    • Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro575 white point: approx. 7,500
    • Sony Xperia XZ3569 White Point: Approx. 7,900
    • Sony Xperia 5 III563White point: approx. 7,200
    • Samsung Galaxy S10e562White point: approx. 7,400
    • Cat S52553 White Point: approx. 6,900
    • LG G7 ThinQ546White Point: approx. 9,300
    • Cat S62 Pro543White Point: approx. 8,650
    • Sony Xperia 1 II539 White point: approx. 8,400
    • Sony Xperia 5 II536White point: approx. 7,500
    • Huawei P30 Pro531White point: approx. 7,800
    • Huawei P20 Pro527 white point: approx. 6,900
    • Asus ZenFone 6525 white point: approx. 7,400
    • Samsung Galaxy S10+524 white point: approx. 7,200
    • Oppo Reno2521 white point: approx. 8,000
    • Samsung Galaxy S10519White point: approx. 7,200
    • Motorola Moto G7 Plus518White point: approx. 8,200
    • Huawei P40 Pro516 white point: approx. 7,500
    • Samsung Galaxy A50515 white point: approx. 7,100
    • Motorola One Vision510 white point: approx. 8,000
    • Cat S42510 white point: approx. 6,900
    • Oppo A91508 white point: approx. 7,600
    • li>

    • Doogee V20508 white point: approx. 8,690
    • Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact506 white point: approx. 7,900
    • Motorola Moto G7 Power506white point: approx. 6,900
    • Vivo X60 Pro503white point: approx. 7,600
    • Gigaset GS4501 white point: approx. 9,700
    • Oppo Find X2 Pro482White point: approx. 7,900
    • Nokia 7 Plus473White point: approx. 7,800
    • Motorola Moto G7473White Point: approx. 7,900
    • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S472White Point: approx 7,800
    • Motorola One470 white point: about 7,700
    • Samsung Galaxy A6463 white point: approx. 8,100
    • Gigaset GS5456 white point: approx. 8,385
    • < li class="chart__row chart__row--hidden toggle-body-item nojs-tr">LG G8s455 white point: approx. 7,800

    • Nokia 6.1452White point: approx. 9,500
    • Motorola Moto Z3 Play444White point: approx. 7,500
    • OnePlus 6T431 white point: approx. 8,100
    • Google Pixel 4 XL428White point: approx. 6,900
    • BlackBerry Key2420White point: approx. 7,800
    • Google Pixel 3a406 white point: approx. 6,900
    • Google Pixel 3 XL400 white point: approx. 7,200
    • HTC U12+399 white point: approx. 7,500
    • Sony Xperia 1381 white point: approx. 7,600

Unit: Luminance (cd/m²) 84 entries Display brightness min

    • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S1
    • OnePlus 62
    • Nokia 6.12
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 92
    • Sony Xperia XZ32
    • Apple iPhone Xs Max2
    • Google Pixel 3 XL2
    • OnePlus 6T2
    • Apple iPhone Xr2
    • Motorola Moto G7 Plus2
    • Samsung Galaxy S10+2
    • Samsung Galaxy S102
    • Samsung Galaxy S10e2
    • Huawei P30 Pro2
    • Google Pixel 3a2
    • OnePlus 7 Pro2
    • Samsung Galaxy A502
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 10+2
    • OnePlus 7T2
    • Apple iPhone 112
    • Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max2
    • Google Pixel 4 XL2
    • Samsung Galaxy S202
    • Samsung Galaxy S20+2
    • Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra2
    • Oppo Find X2 Pro2
    • Huawei P40 Pro2
    • Oppo A912
    • LG Velvet2
    • Sony Xperia 1 II2
    • Google Pixel 4a2
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra2
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 22
    • Google Pixel 52
    • Sony Xperia 5 II2
    • Google Pixel 4a 5G2
    • Apple iPhone 122
    • Apple iPhone 12 Pro2
    • Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max2
    • Apple iPhone 12 mini2
    • Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra2
    • Xiaomi Mi 112
    • OnePlus 9 Pro2
    • Samsung Galaxy A52 5G2
    • Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra2
    • Vivo X60 Pro2
    • OnePlus Nord 22
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 32
    • Apple iPhone 13 Pro2
    • Apple iPhone 13 mini2
    • Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max2
    • Google Pixel 62
    • Google Pixel 6 Pro2
    • Samsung Galaxy S22+2
    • Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra2
    • Samsung Galaxy S222
    • Nothing Phone (1)2
    • Google Pixel 6a2
    • Asus Zenfone 92
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (inside) (Auto, 100% APL)2
    • HTC U12+3
    • Motorola Moto G7 Power3
    • Motorola Moto G73
    • Motorola One Vision3
    • Sony Xperia 13
    • LG G8s3
    • OnePlus 8 Pro3
    • OnePlus 8T3< /li>
    • LG Wing3
    • OnePlus 93
    • Oppo Find X3 Pro3
    • Nokia XR203
    • Samsung Galaxy A64
    • BlackBerry Key24
    • Huawei Mate 20 Pro4
    • Asus ZenFone 64
    • Gigaset GX2904
    • OnePlus Nord4
    • Sony Xperia 5 III4
    • Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact5
    • LG G7 ThinQ5
    • Motorola Moto G8 Plus5
    • Gigaset GS45
    • Qualcomm Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders5
    • Asus ROG Phone 65
    • Samsung Galaxy S96
    • Samsung Galaxy S9+6
    • Motorola Moto G66
    • Nokia 7 Plus6
    • Motorola One6
    • Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro6
    • Motorola Moto Z3 Play7
    • Cat S4210
    • Unihertz Titan11
    • Cat S62 Pro11
    • Huawei P20 Pro15
    • Gigaset GS518
    • Cat S5221
    • Cat S6127
    • Doogee V2030

Unit: Luminance (cd/m²) 85 entries Display contrast

    • Samsung Galaxy S95.000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S9+5,000:1OLED display
    • Huawei P20 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • < li class="chart__row chart__row--hidden toggle-body-item nojs-tr">OnePlus 65,000:1OLED display

    • Samsung Galaxy A65,000:1OLED Display
    • Motorola Moto Z3 Play5,000:1OLED Display
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 95,000:1OLED display
    • Sony Xperia XZ35,000:1OLED Display
    • Apple iPhone Xs Max5,000:1OLED Display
    • Google Pixel 3 XL5,000:1OLED display
    • Huawei Mate 20 Pro5000:1OLED Display
    • OnePlus 6T5000:1OLED Display
    • Samsung Galaxy S10+5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S105.000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S10e5.000:1OLED display
    • Huawei P30 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • Google Pixel 3a5000:1OLED Display
    • OnePlus 7 Pro5000:1OLED Display
    • Samsung Galaxy A505.000:1OLED display
    • Sony Xperia 15,000:1OLED display
    • LG G8s5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 10+5,000:1OLED display
    • OnePlus 7T5,000:1OLED display
    • Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max5,000:1OLED display
    • Google Pixel 4 XL5,000:1OLED display
    • Oppo Reno25,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S205.000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S20+5000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra5000:1OLED display
    • Oppo Find X2 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • Huawei P40 Pro5000:1OLED Display
    • OnePlus 8 Pro5000:1OLED Display
    • Oppo A915.000:1OLED display
    • LG Velvet5000:1OLED Display
    • Sony Xperia 1 II5000:1OLED Display
    • OnePlus Nord5.000:1OLED display
    • Google Pixel 4a5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 25,000:1 OLED display
    • Google Pixel 55,000:1 OLED display
    • < li class="chart__row chart__row--hidden toggle-body-item nojs-tr">OnePlus 8T5.000:1OLED display

    • Sony Xperia 5 II5,000:1OLED display
    • Google Pixel 4a 5G5,000:1OLED display
    • Apple iPhone 125,000:1OLED display
    • Apple iPhone 12 Pro5000:1OLED Display
    • Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max5000:1OLED Display
    • Apple iPhone 12 mini5,000:1OLED display
    • LG Wing5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra5,000:1OLED display
    • Xiaomi Mi 115,000:1OLED Display
    • OnePlus 95,000:1OLED Display
    • OnePlus 9 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • Oppo Find X3 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy A52 5G5,000:1OLED display
    • Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra5,000:1OLED display
    • Vivo X60 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • OnePlus Nord 25,000:1OLED display
    • Qualcomm Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 35,000:1OLED display
    • Sony Xperia 5 III5,000:1OLED display
    • Apple iPhone 13 Pro5,000:1OLED display
    • Apple iPhone 13 mini5,000:1OLED display
    • Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max5,000:1OLED display
    • Google Pixel 65,000:1OLED display
    • Google Pixel 6 Pro 5,000:1OLED display
    • Doogee V205,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S22+5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra5,000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy S225,000:1OLED display
    • Asus ROG Phone 65,000:1 OLED display
    • Nothing Phone (1)5,000:1 OLED display
    • Google Pixel 6a5 .000:1OLED display
    • Asus Zenfone 95.000:1OLED display
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 (inside) (Auto , 100% APL)5,000:1OLED display
    • Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S2.471:1
    • HTC U12+2.241:1
    • Nokia 7 Plus2.130:1
    • Motorola One1.980:1
    • LG G7 ThinQ1.876:1
    • BlackBerry Key21.875:1
    • Motorola Moto G7 Power1.833:1
    • Cat S521.728:1
    • Apple iPhone Xr1.670:1
    • Motorola Moto G8 Plus1.665: 1
    • Apple iPhone 111.597:1
    • Asus ZenFone 61.551:1
    • Nokia XR201.518:1
    • Motorola Moto G71. 511:1
    • Cat S62 Pro1.429:1
    • Gigaset GS41.407:1
    • Cat S611.400:1
    • Cat S421.378:1
    • Gigaset GX2901.367:1
    • Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro1.275:1
    • Motorola Moto G7 Plus1.230:1
    • Nokia 6.11.180:1
    • Gigaset GS51.151:1
    • Motorola Moto G61.081:1
    • Motorola One Vision1.045:1
    • Unihertz Titan953:1

Unit: Contrast

measured values ​​for inner and outer OLED panel

For the sake of clarity, the following table only shows the measurement results of the Fold 4 for brightness separately for the inner and outer display in all three modes, each with three APL levels. It can also be seen that the outer OLED panel is designed for even higher brightness than the inner panel and in this point ends up between the measured values ​​of a Galaxy S22 and S22+.

Display inside Display outside Manual 100% APL 502 cd/m² 498 cd/m² 20% APL 562 cd/m² 625 cd/m² 10% APL 572 cd/m² 639 cd/m² Manual + Boost 100% APL 794 cd/m² d.782 /m² 20% APL 930 cd/m² 1,068 cd/m² 10% APL 948 cd/m² 1,103 cd/m² Automatic 100% APL 1,004 cd/m² 1,009 cd/m² 20% APL 1,210 cd/m² 1,210 cd/m² 1,210 cd/m² 1,210 cd/m² 7% cd/m² 1,210 cd/m² 1,250 cd/m² 1,468 cd/m²

The bottom line at Samsung is that the Galaxy S22+ and in particular the Galaxy S22 Ultra are still equipped with the best screens from the supplier Samsung Display. However, the Fold 4 does not lack much, so that when other properties such as the adaptive refresh rate of 1 to 120 Hz or the solid color matching are taken into account, it has to be said that the screens are at least good, if not very good, if the foldable properties are also taken into account.

Page 1/4 Next Page
Performance and Software


Posted

in

by

Tags: