Published 15 December 2021 at 18.37
Abroad. The most likely explanation for the origin of the coronavirus is that it came from a laboratory. This was stated by a Canadian molecular biologist at a committee hearing in the British Parliament on Wednesday, reports Metro.
Like the article p & aring; Facebook
Origin of coronavirus
- SVT Reporter: I was forced to stop researching lab theory
- & quot; Conspiracy Theory & quot; deleted from old articles
- & quot; Sanslöst & quot ;: The Swedish expert on MSB & # 39 ;s & quot; conspiracy theory & quot;
- Facebook begins to allow lab theories about the virus
- Wuhan virologists became ill before the pandemic
Show all
That the virus that led to the covid-19 epidemic would have spread from a lab was previously dismissed as a crazy and racist conspiracy theory.
But the winds have turned quickly.
Molecular biologist Alina Chan, who specializes in gene therapy and cell technology and co-author of a famous book on covid-19, was questioned today by the British House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee.
– At this point, I think it is more likely that the virus came from a laboratory than that it has a natural origin, she said.
Alina Chan stated that everyone agrees that a so-called super-spreading event took place in Wuhan's infamous “wet market”. However, after two years, there is still no evidence that the coronavirus came from any animal on the market.
May have been created
The virus may also have created by man, according to Alina Chan.
– We have heard from many top virologists that a genetically modified origin is reasonable. It also includes virologists who made modifications to the first Sars virus, she said. to 50 years “:
– Right now it is not safe for people who know the origin of the pandemic to appear.