Immigrant lawyers are excluded from society

0
172

Published June 30, 2021 at 5:29 pm

Domestic. Turk Ekrem Güngör and Arab Amir Amdouni are expelled from the Bar Association after being exposed for leaking information from the police to the criminal Vårbyn network.

Like the article p & aring; Facebook

Ekrem Güngör and Amir Amdouni have been co-owners of the law firm Devlet. On the Bar Association's website, the firm offers legal services in Kurdish, Turkish, Arabic and several other languages ​​that are common among criminals. .

In communication with the serious criminals, the lawyers must have called themselves “the King” (the Turk) and “the Prince” (the Arab), respectively.

“You help us – we help you” the gang leader for the Vårbynätverket is said to have written to the duo.

The lawyers are said to have used Encrochat, an app for criminals, to leak secret information from an arrest hearing, broken against a court's restraining order, the Vårbyn network helped to locate weapons and helped the gang to avoid being caught by the police. According to Expressen, the lawyers called an enemy of the Vårbynätverket the “whore” and referred to a police raid as that they “made a whorehouse”.

In 2018 and 2019, Ekrem Güngör received a total of SEK 11 million in fees from the state for assignments as a public defender. Amir Amdouni was fired last autumn from a defense assignment regarding the murder in Kungens kurva, which according to Aftonbladet was due to “legal ethical reasons”.

Güngör and Amdouni are now excluded from the Swedish Bar Association with immediate effect.

“In summary, the board has found that one of the lawyers has seriously violated good legal practice in two cases which involved information covered by a restraining order and restrictions being passed on to outsiders. The circumstances of each of the violations have been particularly aggravating. In addition, the board has found that the lawyer violated good legal practice by undertaking assignments for which he lacked sufficient experience, and by the manner in which he performed the assignments “, the society writes in a press release.

The other lawyer has” also, in extremely aggravating circumstances, been found serious The lawyer has also been found to have seriously violated good legal practice by not attending the board's meeting. The circumstances regarding the failure to participate have also been extremely aggravating. “

The lawyer has also violated a good lawyer custom “by depositing in its client funds account a payment attributable to an apartment sale, without first having ensured that the client's wife's rights were not jeopardized”, writes Advokatsamfundet.