The Rohingya are the world’s most well-known States, but millions of others especially in India face a similar fate. The causes date back to the colonial period.
In India’s state of Assam, nearly two million people struggle for the recognition of their citizenship. After a year long discussion and in a highly controversial process, the government of the state was published in mid-September, the National citizens register (National Register of Citizens, NRC). In it is listed, who is recognized by a total of 33 million inhabitants, as a citizen, and who is “illegal Migrant”.
Those who could not prove that he existed before the balance sheet date 24. In March 1971, the Federal state has lived up to its Status as “doubtful”. The date refers to the day before the start of the Bangladesh war when the former East Pakistan declared independence from West Pakistan. In consequence of the war is estimated to have fled ten million inhabitants of East Pakistan or Bangladesh to India, whose descendants live partly still there.
Parallels in India and Myanmar
The 1.9 million inhabitants of Assam, their nationality is now in doubt, threatened with internment, or deportation. India’s interior Minister Amit Shah was on a visit to Assam on 8. September announced: “We will throw every single illegal immigrant out of this.” The Indian sociologist and former employees of the United Nations Anuradha Sen Mookerjee writes on “The Conversation”, a Blog of various universities and research institutions: “most likely the NRC is a large process and long-lasting suffering that is associated with the statelessness.”
Residents from Assam to check whether their names have made it to the list of recognized citizens
The rhetoric of the Minister and the warning Mokerjees’s statue in dealing with the Rohingya in Myanmar, which will be referred to only as “Bengali”. In order to be displayed, that is, illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. De facto, the Rohingya are stateless. The statelessness is according to the consensus view of the experts, and the UN is the Central Problem of their precarious situation.
The situation of the Rohingya and the threat of statelessness of almost two million people in Assam are a result of the eventful history of Asia in the 21st century. Century and the restrictive state of civil rights in these countries.
Of States roots of homelessness
Before the arrival of Europeans, the idea of a nation-state and the associated state citizens, living within clearly defined boundaries was absent in Asia. Regional hikes were common, the boundaries between the influential king and principalities fluent. With the arrival of Europeans, the idea of nation-state came true, but almost all Asian countries were part of European empires. Thus, the present-day countries of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Myanmar (until 1937) were part of British India.
Within the Empires, there were always migrating, but because they were within British India took place, not as Out – and immigration. In fact, the British encouraged Migration as an important Element of your divide-and-rule policies, or to the colonial major projects workforce supply. The development of the Irrawaddy Delta, which made Burma (now Myanmar) to a leading rice exporter, was the result of the targeted settlement of labour from British India.
Bangladesh plan for the relocation of up to 100,000 Rohingya refugees on the island of Bhasan Char in the Bay of Bengal. Critics speak of an internment camp
Citizenship law
After the end of the Second world war and with the independence of India and Pakistan (East and West) in 1947, a other Asian Nations continued to walk. “The dismantling of empires and the drawing of new borders produced countless refugees. They also produced a patchwork of minorities within the new borders”, the historian Sunil S. Amrith Harvard University. Exact Figures are not available, but estimates range from ten to twelve million people that emigrated after the partition of Pakistan and India in the other part.
In addition to offsetting Migration, it came to the arbitrary division of culturally and linguistically related regions. Everywhere in Asia, multi-ethnic and multi-religious States. In the further course of the 20th century. Century, there were repeated major refugee movements, such as in the aforementioned Bangladesh war.
The law of descent and difficult naturalization
The new States had to adopt the 1945 and 1950, in the shortest possible time, new citizenship rights. In General, they adopted the laws of the colonial powers, which were later adjusted. And two of the problem the basic elements come to Bear, which has borne the legal scholars Olivier Vonk, in his study on “Citizenship in Asia” together:
First of all, a descent prevails since independence in most countries of Asia, right. As a result, a state confers its citizenship only to children whose parents (or at least one parent) state, are citizens of this state. This leads to very long recognition of periods if the date, as in the case of Assam, lies far back in time. An example: A Person who has come with three years in March 1971, after India, and for 48 years, lives there, has no right to citizenship. Their children have no right to be citizens of the country in which you, your whole life spent.
In 1971, Indian troops in the war between West and East Pakistan, intervened. More than ten million people fled to India
Secondly, none of the countries in question offers a simplified naturalisation. This means that, refugees and stateless persons have over the generations, no Chance to change their Status. Vonk concludes: “Asia is probably the continent where the state is citizenship, the jealous, the most protected.” The reason for this is That due to colonial-era and subsequent conflict, is very young date of these States, who want to secure their own identity.
75 years after the end of the colonial period, the requirements of a modern bureaucracy with the historical realities collide. Not only the legal side of citizenship in the countries is problematic, but also the practical implementation. Many millions of people in South and Southeast Asia don’t have the documents necessary to have the nationality proof. In the colonial period and, in addition, there was often no birth certificates or were lost in the turmoil of the escape. In the statelessness were pushed and arms mainly and landless citizens. Land ownership is still the best way to demonstrate, since when one lives where. This practical Dimension is discussed in India and Myanmar, much too little.
India is building camps to “illegal migrants” in Assam to inter-renal
Weak recognition of international Law
Finally, the current political climate in the Region of millions in Asia at risk of statelessness. India, Bangladesh and Myanmar have none of the three UN conventions for the protection of refugees and stateless persons was signed. The conventions could be in the Region of currently high in the course, the ideas of purity and identity of one’s own race or Religion, such as those of Narendra Modi’s Indian people’s party (BJP), with the Superiority of Hinduism is propagated to counter it. This is not a new one, which the BJP propagated. The student movement “Assam Movement” has been made in the late 1970s and early 1980s against “illegal migrants” mobile.
Watch the Video 03:52
Rohingya fear relocation
Facebook Twitter google+ send Tumblr VZ Xing Newsvine Digg
Permalink https://p.dw.com/p/3OsvK