Is Dortmund a stop to this season? The essential question for this round is from the point of view of Sarah Wiertz, however: Why is there a Video wizard, if he remains in undisputed scenes silent?
Augsburg coach Manuel Baum talked himself into a Rage, as he was raised on the first goal. In fact, the scene is debatable, but not clearly on Lars Stindl, the passive Offside, because he irritates the other players or the view? In the match Mainz against Nuremberg, a goal, in retrospect, was withdrawn, because the Video referee from Cologne had seen after viewing the pictures, a wafer-thin offside position of Adam Zrelak. In Dortmund, Thomas Delaney met in the penalty area with a stretched leg and open sole of Hanover Noah Sarenren Bazee at the ankle joint, a whistle sounded. There was no card, no penalty and no contact with the Cologne video wizard Headquarters.
So that everyone who reads here is in the know – here’s the scene in question is:
Questions? Yes, I actually have one. And aimed at the German football Association and its refereeing: How can it be that the Video-wizard reports after this scene? It is a indisputable Situation. There is a clear rule violation, according to the statues of the DFB, rule 12 (Fouls and misconduct). It says:
A direct free kick will given if a player commits any of the following Offences, according to the arbitrator against an opponent careless, reckless, or brutal:
- “Negligence” is when a player is careless, reckless or careless in a fight. There is no disciplinary action is required.
- “Recklessness” is when a player acts without regard to the danger to, or consequences for an opponent. Such a player must be shown a yellow card.
- “Brutal game” is when a player goes on exaggerated hard and the safety of an opponent at risk. Such a player must be expelled from the field.
DW-editor, Sarah Wiertz
Whether negligent, reckless, or brutal this may not be for one or the other might still be Discretionary, even if it is, in my opinion. In any case, it would have had to at least give a Yellow card and a penalty. It happened, however, nothing.
The referee has not seen it, apparently, was distracted or has interpreted it in fact wrong. But just then, the man must be in the ear report, the intervention, according to the statutes of the German football League, if:
“a clear and obvious wrong decision of the referee on the pitch and in the four possible cases: goals rzielung, penalty/penalty kick, Red card and likelihood of a player.”
“For me, there is no reason not to whistle. It was a clear Foul in the penalty area. It is to me inexplicable, why, in the video an assistant da not intervened. This is a clear Must,” said Ex-FIFA referee Markus Merk during the TV channel Sky.
For Gladbach against Augsburg, the Video wizard is not mixed the right way, because it is not clear whether Stindl goalkeeper Gregor Kobel or against players Kevin Danso irritated in the Off-standing and easy for the foot lifting. Nuremberg was revoked after the Intervention of the Video-wizard to a goal due to minimal off-side position but. In a scene in which a player’s health is in danger, in an obvious penalty not given, not registered in the Video – wizard. Then he can be silenced, in my opinion.