The contract for the British EU exit “in principle”. In the political Declaration met with on the future of the economic relations, however, strong criticism, even in the case of Theresa Mays Tories.
The British Prime Minister Theresa May had traveled in the last Minute after Brussels, to the EU wresting a few concessions with which the political Declaration on the future of the business-to-digest would relations for their members easier. But there is not much she could bring, and a discernable shift in Opinion was observed on Thursday in her appearance in Westminster, championing their political Goods.
It is this Deal or no
The Prime Minister brought no new arguments to sell the policy statement to the people on the opposition benches in the house of Commons. “This is the right Deal for Britain” in weeks, and one of its leitmotifs. But so often the enthusiasm of the members is not growing, this claim is also repeated. “We are protecting Jobs and the safety [of our country], we stop the movement,” says May, who wants instead a System based on qualifications. In principle, the government plans, only higher-qualified applicants from the EU to the labour market.
“We need to end court the case-law of the European court,” the Prime Minister, to take control of their own money, and so on. May clings to the claim that this was the Brexit, for the voters in 2016 would have voted, and that they were motivated primarily by the issues of Immigration and sovereignty. In addition, it managed to avoid a hard limit in Northern Ireland.
Paints pictures of a Golden political future: Theresa May
And then Theresa May, designs on the Basis of the so-called political Declaration, nor the image of a Golden political future: There will be new agreements for free trade, for fishing, for the exchange of goods and services, a security partnership, and all of this will pave the way for “a brighter future for our country. This Deal is in reach, and I’m going to implement it”.
Unicorns and a Brexit blindfolded
The leader of the opposition Jeremy Corbyn could otherwise be done often rather weak and unfocused in his attacks on Theresa May, this afternoon, a hit to the other land: “What the government has in the last two years? You have come a long way since the Referendum less than a page per month. This is a Brexit blindfolded, a leap into the Dark.” Because the MPs in Westminster have now come to understand that, although the 586 pages of a long divorce agreement is legally binding, the only 26-page political Declaration will be finalised on Thursday by negotiators for both sides, but only a diplomatic bouquet of flowers with limited liability. A political framework within which the negotiations can move, but must not, after the Brexit is completed by the end of March 2019.
The Labour MP Hillary Benn pointed to another major flaw of the agreement with Brussels. Theresa May had promised dozens of times to “smooth trading with the EU,” according to the Brexit. “You must first convince the opposition to their deal, the Prime Minister, that you can’t reach a smooth trade if you the customs Union and the single market leaves?”
Watch Video 42:31 live Now 42:31 Min. 
Share
Showdown: Who will win the Brexit-Drama?
Send Facebook Twitter google+ Tumblr VZ Mr. Wong Xing Newsvine Digg
Permalink https://p.dw.com/p/38iKa
Showdown: Who will win the Brexit-Drama?
This is the Finger in the wound, because, contrary to may’s request, the Declaration does not mention the term, but expressly points to future checks and inspections. Thus, the Vision that had stood in the center of the promises by the Brexit advocates, that it could go to the Brexit as before ends. “A lot of unicorns to replace in the future relationship with the facts. All of this means a blind Brexit,” says Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish Prime Minister. Your SNP will vote against it.
Criticism from within its own ranks
Boris Johnson, one of the most biting critics of the Prime Minister, fires a broadside against May because of the so-called “Backstop” for Ireland: “This Deal gives the EU a permanent Veto on the UK’s ability to trade agreements.” The temporary customs agreement in the termination agreement is for him and his attitude is the biggest betrayal, the committed the Prime Minister to the idea of an unencumbered, free Brexit enjoyed almost.
And Co-Brexiteer Ian Duncan Smith announces that he and his colleagues against the Deal would vote in this Form. How many members will beat really on the side of this group is uncertain. But it could be a higher two-digit number.
Anyone planning here secretly, against the Deal with votes? The house of Commons at work
If we add the Northern Irish unionists of the DUP and the threats of the Scottish Tories seriously, the screaming because of the “future fisheries agreement with access to UK waters” in the political Declaration also “betrayal”, then Theresa May is miles currently, far from it, to bring the Deal through the Parliament. The vote was to take place in the first half of December, and it is unclear what can you do Theresa May in the meantime, to contact the sheet and a sufficient number of deputies to change their minds.
What remains is the threat of No Deal, the hard Brexit without agreement. The Opposition hopes that the Parliament will not allow this to happen. The step from this cul-de-SAC would then be a second Referendum. The battle for the Brexit is now held between the Prime Minister and their opponents in the lower house. And the output is completely open.