American minister of Justice is looking for careful overtures to Snowden

0
220

The Us secretary of Justice Eric Holder wants to whistleblower Edward Snowden is still no safe-conduct if he returns to the US, but wants the ‘dialogue’. Snowden himself states that the current Us legislation for whistleblowers and there is no room for a return.

Edward Snowden responded Thursday via Freesnowden.on questions from the audience. Snowden left the question of whether he would go to the United States could return from Russia to know that he would like to, but that outdated American law, and this for him is almost impossible. According to Snowden would be the current Us laws severely outdated for whistle-blowers to provide adequate protection, because the law does not apply to government-hired workers. The whistleblower thinks that until that time no real possibility to return to the US and a fair trial meet.

The American minister of Justice seems to turn gently approach her in the direction of Snowden. Eric Holder has let us know that he is a ‘dialogue wants to enter into with the whistleblower and his attorneys. The minister went even as far as that he was a safe-conduct wanted to give it to Snowden. He qualifies his position as an ‘accused’ and that there is room for negotiation if the whistleblower a partial debt payable to issue.

Snowden showed during question time from Russia further know that he never passwords has been ‘borrowed’ or taken from former NSA colleagues. Previous posts with a similar conclusion on the basis of responses from former NSA colleagues went into hiding, even in december.

For the future hopes Snowden that partly as a result of his revelations countries to negotiate international rules that establish the limits of cyber-espionage to be committed. So would socially critical infrastructure, such as hospitals or power plants, are never attacked. Also all sleepnetmethodes that among other things, the NSA and GCHQ use according to Snowden be prohibited because it is not only the rights of citizens to affect but also are ineffective in evidence.