Instagram: it is not our intention photos to sell

0
290

Instagram let in a statement to know is to listen to the criticism and the text of the terms and conditions to make clear what the with the photos of users and does not want to do. The service emphasizes that it is not the intention to use the photos to sell.

“Once the changes have been made, we have to be loud and clearly heard that many users find confusing and dismayed at what the changes mean,” says Kevin Systrom, co-founder of Instagram, “We will do more to answer your questions, to correct mistakes and eliminate the confusion.” Instagram is going to be policy initiated with photos is probably not reversible, but ambiguities in the text of the terms and conditions change, as evidenced by the communication. “We take all of the feedback and stories in the press and we are going to specific parts of modify the terms to make clear what happens with your photos.”

Systrom states that it is in any case not the intention is to use photos to sell, as a lot of the media wrote: “We respect that your photos you photos. Point.” Also says Instagram has no plans to make it possible that photos part of advertisements may be and that the passage where this from made could be deleted. Did, however, say the service in to stay put on ‘innovative forms of advertising and no banners in the app to places that detract from the ‘Instagram experience’.

Systtrom gives an example of a advertentiemethode where the service is to think and that is similar to Facebooks “Like” model: “Suppose a business account wants to promote and more followers wants. It would help to see who of the people you follow, also this company to follow. In this way, some of the data you produce – like the actions you perform and your profile picture will appear if you this company.”

Tuesday was much commotion about the modified general terms and among other things called on mass accounts and to delete photos. Instagram holds itself the right to take photos on Instagram to show in the context of ‘sponsored content’ or ‘promotions’, but a lot of the media wrote that the service users’photos, went to sell.