Comment: the endgame in Syria?

0
359

Syria War

Comment: the endgame in Syria?

While in Geneva, to negotiate, wants to create Russia and Assad with their Offensive on Aleppo facts. Especially a Player is happy about this development and will emerge as the winner, says Alexander Kudascheff.

It looks like the endgame. In Syria. Bashar al-Assad gains the upper hand again. With Russian help, with massive Russian air strikes. And probably even with massive logistical and technical support to the Syrian army on the ground. The struggle for Aleppo bears the character of a decisive battle. Win Assad’s forces the city back then would have been the Syrian Despot more than just a battle won. He would be back by the all-controlling factor in the burning and collapse of Syria. The citizens but would continue to be the only escape, adaptation or death.

On the other hand: Syria is almost only a geographical definition of art. A mosaic of regions, places, villages, regions, even cities, in which time the Syrian government and the various opposition forces and once the Mörderbanden the Al-Nusra Front and the so-called “Islamic state” (IS) have a Say. The people, at least, the citizens of Syria, have in this bloody civil war only one role: they are victims. Your life does not count.

Russia: Assad’s Side

Came back Assad by the Russians. You have the vacuum used. Putin is determined to an. A goal is: Assad should remain in Power. The associates of the Kremlin currently everything under. Hence, this strict military determination – without any Hesitation. A second goal: stability in this Region also by an autocracy. Nobody talks more of an Arab spring or even the nice idea of an Arab democracy. This dream is an Illusion placed. However, whether a zusammengeschossenes Syria even Remotely a factor for stability can be sure no one has an answer.

DW editor-in-chief Alexander Kudascheff

The entire West, but especially the United States, so Barack Obama, to look at Council, but mainly sit idly by. You know, that a military operation-nothing and poses the risk, in a still even if the escalation for even more parties to an end. On whose side should Western troops be fighting?

Western Helplessness

That is why the politicians decided on the peace talks in Geneva – although this has until the end of February, should be continued. There hopes of the West on a solution at the negotiating table, while in Syria the facts on the ground are to be created. The all-important question is: Who should Syria actually after a negotiated peace to reign? An Opposition that no one behind? Assad, supported on the bayonets of the Russians? Or let us say it openly: the Islamist jihadists? And it will be Syria, as before in 2011 at all? The Western confusion that has power vacuum created in the Terrormilizen and Putin and Assad ever could trust.

Remains of the proxy war and thus the two regional powers: Saudi Arabia and Iran. In Riyadh, one has the sign of the times. With a hesitant, almost fearful restraint does not continue. The USA is the Royal family only conditionally support, rather support. So you have to be on your own power, and Saudi Arabia now offers even ground troops against the IS. An almost revolutionary shift in consciousness – from the fear of the end was born. The true winner of this murderous Machtspiels but is to say: Iran. Since Iran is by and according to the Syria war to be the dominant regional power in the Middle East. In Jerusalem is concerned. The endgame in Syria has begun.

You can below this article, leave a comment. We look forward to your opinion!