From the point of view of the IMF family businesses are partly responsible for the increasing inequality in Germany. The head of the Foundation for family businesses, Brun-Hagen Hennerkes, finds that The opposite is true.
It makes sit up and take notice when the International monetary Fund (IMF) deals with the role of family businesses in Germany. Finally, one would think, also recognizes the monetary Fund that the global family companies in Germany to prosperity. Surprisingly, the IMF sees little light and much shadow. The Fund considers the strength of the major German family enterprises as the main reason for the unequal distribution of wealth. In the study, it is provocative, in Germany, the biggest assets lie in the hands of “industrial dynasties”. This statement is grossly incorrect. The social market economy proves the opposite.
It is unsettled that the monetary funds have been essential insights are lost. There are companies, especially the family, the unequal developments in a variety of ways to prevent it. The family business almost 60 percent of all jobs in Germany. Thus, they ensure that inequality is avoided by unemployment. The monetary Fund in the past several times occasion to wonder. As the Federal government brought in the years after the financial crisis, the state budget in order, had to defend Berlin in the criticism of the IMF. From Washington it was said that Germany should not overdo it with the Save. The success of our export business, the encounter in the German current account surplus reflected in the IMF on a lack of understanding. The current analysis of the IMF is one-sided, inadequate and faulty.
Brun-Hagen Hennerkes
A family business to counteract regional disparities
The monetary Fund is failing to recognise the importance of family businesses for the country. It is the family companies that keep everywhere in Germany, the job engine Running. They are rare in large Metropolitan areas, but in rural areas and thus counteract regional disparities. In spite of increasing globalization, they pay most of their taxes in the home country.
The judgment of the IMF, a few large family business holding, the threads in the German economy in the Hand, is nonsensical. It is precisely the diversity of family companies, which ensures our prosperity, and the us abroad to be envied. In Germany alone, there are 1300 secret world market leaders to niche markets around the world. The 500 largest family businesses, including well-known names such as the Black group, Oetker, Stihl and Karcher, counting have created in the past decade, more jobs in Germany than the anonymous Dax companies. While the TOP 500 family, the number of employees in companies increased in Germany by 23 percent, rose said Dax-listed corporations in free float, domestic employment by only four percent.
The IMF raised question of the concentration of Wealth must be considered in the historical context. The German family-owned companies are so successful, because they operate in the long term and in a sustainable manner. You aspire to pass the company on to the next Generation. In the course of time have arisen in this way, large, internationally active family business, and thus large fortune. But this is not a disadvantage, as the IMF believes, incorrectly, but this secures our competitiveness. Because these assets are productively tied up in the company.
Factor of stability even in times of crisis
For family businesses, it is typical that they have to invest profits back. Last year, late many years of the trump-in-chief Berthold Leibinger once said: “I was always of the opinion that the projected profits must first be available to the company.” According to this Maxim, most of the family companies. This means more investment and jobs. The strong substance of the family-owned company has helped demonstrably to survive times of crisis without mass dismissals. It would be negligent not to want to change that.
The economic policy advice given by the IMF of the policy, to convince in any way. The monetary Fund, recommends that you increase taxes on wealth and encourages, in particular, higher inheritance taxes. Here, the IMF completely ignores the fact that Germany has long since become a highly expensive country. Since the last corporate tax reform eleven years have passed. In the tax competition is always more. To demand In this Situation, higher inheritance taxes, is irresponsible. Since the inheritance tax reform in 2016, the Transfer of the business assets is connected to the next Generation with a considerable burden. The growing inheritance proves tax revenue. New loads would be poison for our country.
The analysis of the IMF overlooks the fact that Germany is performing in the income distribution well. States with high taxation and a high proportion of listed companies are not superior to us in any case. To measure the income inequality, then Germany is in a better state than the rest of the G-7 countries USA, UK, France, Italy, Japan and Canada. To alarmism, no occasion in any case.
Prof. Dr. Dr. h. C. mult. Brun-Hagen Hennerkes, Chairman of the Board of the Foundation for family businesses.
This article first appeared in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) on 15.07.2019