In almost all European countries, there are now parties that the EU reject it in its present Form. What unites them in addition, and what separates it at a Glance.
Germany – AfD
The AfD gives the EU a grace period. The EU needs to give back in the eyes of the party, a large part of its powers to the nation States. If that does not happen, the AfD in European elections in drastic consequences. Then “we hold a German exit or an orderly dissolution of the European Union and the establishment of a new European economic and community of interest as a last Option for necessary”. The AfD holds the European Parliament in the same way as the Euro is superfluous. Germany should return to the D-Mark. The dispute has given especially about how quickly the EU should reform. In the slogan the speech was of a (European) parliamentary term of five years. Now it is vague: “in a reasonable period of time”.
United Kingdom – UKIP
The party for the independence of the United Kingdom sees its main Mission as well as meets: the UK’s exit from the EU. This is also the reason why the UKIP is weakening since the Brexit Referendum: Why should they choose UKIP, if the two major parties in the country, the Conservatives and Labour want to exit?
The former UKIP chief Nigel Farage could not believe after the Brexit vote in 2016, his luck
However, the UKIP fears of Brexit will be either “soft” fail, or at the end. In the case, the party would take up again travel. UKIP is in anyway a role model and benchmark in the whole of Europe for all who want to get out of the EU, and enjoys something of a hero status.
France – National collection of movement, earlier National Front
The Europe-friendly Emmanuel Macron had beaten his highly EU-critical rival Marine Le Pen in the second round of the presidential choice is clear. But since the “yellow West”-protests against Macrons policy, Le Pen felt again upper water. From the choice against Macron she has learned. Their former demand, and bail out of the Euro, has cost them at the time, apparently, many votes. Your Position has moderated since then. You will also no complete abolition of the EU. Instead, it should be a “Europe of Nations”. Important the party is, in any case, the control of its state’s borders to prevent illegal immigration. The Schengen agreement in its current Form, it therefore rejects.
Austria – FPÖ
The Freedom party of Austria was up in the 70s as a driving force for the accession of Austria to the predecessor organizations of the EU. But at least since the chairmanship of Jörg Haider in the eighties, it is EU-sceptical to hostile. Already, out of respect for the Senior coalition partner, the ÖVP under Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, the FPÖ, however, occurs moderate.
Austrian home instead of Europe: FPÖ-Chairman and Vice-Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache
Short had demanded in the election campaign as a condition for a common government, the FPÖ’s all Talk about leaving the EU is in Austria. Since then, the FPÖ calls only EU reforms and more rights for the Nations. This does, however, also Short, only weakened. Especially in the immigration issue, both parties are so close together that the differences are hardly noticed.
The Netherlands – PVV
Immigration and Islam are the major themes of the party for freedom. Europe politically, they occur with less Verve. Here are their positions belong to the “Mainstream” right-wing populist parties in Europe: the influence of The EU in General and the nation-States enhanced reduced. Similar to the AfD, the PVV would abolish the European Parliament, the Commission, however, also. The European cooperation will only run on the member States. An exit from the Euro is not explicitly required. The PVV wants to have a referendum on the question of whether the Netherlands will remain a member of the EU or leakage.
Poland – PiS
A big difference between the PiS and Western European right-wing parties is that the PiS (law and justice party) in Poland, the only party in government, not just Junior partners, as in Austria or the opposition party, as in many other countries. To the EU, the PiS has a two spältiges ratio. The EU’s secular-liberal, globalization – and refugee-friendly.
Of outlet no talk: Pro-EU Demonstration in Poland
On the other hand, you know, the PiS, which depend Probably in Poland benefits greatly from membership of the EU and the Brussels-based payments. In addition, Poland needs the EU partners, with Russia to curb. More security policy cooperation in the EU is desirable in Warsaw. Consequently, in the case of the PiS by a Polish EU-exit. It declined, however, interference in internal Affairs, be it at the refugee distribution, or the removal of the rule of law.
Hungary – Fidesz
Much of what is true for Poland, for Hungary: Fidesz governs alone, as the PiS in Poland – must not take a Partner into consideration. It rejects a European refugee distribution as well strictly. Prime Minister Viktor Orban is trying just like the PiS to the right of the state to heel. The objections of the European Commission, he comes only as far as it is absolutely necessary to the EU to maintain injection mold financial. Because he wants to remain for economic reasons that his country is in the EU. A big difference, however: While the PiS in the EU and NATO provides a security guarantee against Russia, and the sharpest possible sanctions, urges Orban is an admirer of Russian President Vladimir Putin and maintains close contacts with him.
Italy – Lega
The Lega is a special case. They used to be called Lega Nord, and was originally a regional party of the wealthy Italian North. Long as you wanted to its secession from the Italian state. In this Tradition, the Lega was also a Pro-Europe party, which saw in the EU a framework for strong European regions. Today it is Lega, has extended its influence throughout Italy and is as a Junior partner, part of a populist government.
Northern League chief Salvini could imagine the EU to be President of the Commission
Your boss, the Minister of the interior Matteo Salvini, meanwhile, is hardly an opportunity to inveigh against the alleged interference by the Commission, for example, in the budgetary policy. Salvini requested previously, even the abolition of the Euro. He has become small according to the. Ironically, it has brought the sharp critics of the EU but even as the President of the Commission, namely, when an Alliance of right-wing parties after the election to the Europe would be group, Parliament’s second-largest or even largest. “Friends in several European countries ask me,” said Salvini interview smugly in November, in a newspaper, “let’s see. I’ll think about it”.