The British are about Brexit as divided as their representatives, the vote on Tuesday over the exit of the Treaty. There is growing concern that the rule of law unit in the Chaos under the wheels.
This Tuesday, the British Parliament about the Brexit Deal agrees that the government of Prime Minister Theresa May with the EU has negotiated. For a final decision, a majority of the members would have to accept the contract. However, the vote is on the Brink. Because the Parliament is as divided as the population. In opinion polls, as many Respondents called for a second Referendum on the withdrawal, such as for an uncompromising exit without a Deal. A slight majority prefers to stay in the EU, slightly less than half of wants to get out but.
In addition to its political and economic consequences of Brexit stirs up emotions – for example, given the question of what should be for a country of the United Kingdom in the future. “I’ve never felt comfortable with it, that the UK be required by the rules of a instance, which it has not elected and not accountable to anybody, seems to be guilty,” says Andrew Harris, a Brexit supporters in the Welsh small town of Brecon. “I think it is good that we are a geographically small Nation that was always independent. All the negotiations have only confirmed our country from the EU is restricted. Want to us only because of our money.”
Political Chaos worse than the Brexit
Tim Ashton, a farmer in Shropshire in the West Midlands. The election district voted for the exit. Through his studies in Oxford, Ashton has agreed to be friends in London and other large cities, the majority for remaining in the EU. He says the decision at the time, it is not easy: “For me, this is a painful balancing act: this cognitive dissonance when you have two ideas in your head, and you know exactly that they are incompatible. That was not really pleasant.”
Yellow West protests in London, Many Brits have had enough of their government. These protesters are demanding new elections
Ultimately, Ashton voted for remaining in the EU. “I’m not at all convinced supporter of the EU. I can quite imagine a world without the UK in the EU,” he says, but on the way the British Constitution is not allowed to fall under the wheels. “I want the politicians to stay honest. Whatever happens now – no one will be able to claim that there would have been a legitimate democratic mandate.”
Progress Failed Display
Regardless of what side you’re on, many voters agree that the government have made serious missteps in dealing with the negotiations. To calm In an apparent attempt to Brexit-hard-liners in his own party, caused the Prime Minister May, to the outlet of article 50 of the EU treaties, before their government had a clear negotiating position. As a result, the cut-off date for the withdrawal, and many accuse her of, to have in the EU a bargaining advantage. Also the early lower house election that they held in 2017, ended for May’s disastrous: The vote cost them their majority and paved ultimately the way for the current stalemate in Parliament.
“It was a real mess,” says the Welshman Brexit advocates of Harris. “All the major political parties have used the Brexit as a game ball. No one cooperates with the other to give the Best for everyone’s sake, and the result is a No-Deal, stands before us now, nobody has something. All political parties have left each other completely in the lurch.”
The retired lecturer John Bird lives in London and has voted against the Brexit. But he sees it similar to Harris: “The progress has been incredibly low. If I Brexit advocates would be, I would not have wanted, that May be explained in advance of when you want to escape. This is, as you would say, when a building is finished before you know how much Material you need. This is complete recklessness.”
Is concerned about the aggressive mood that triggers the Brexit-the Chaos among the British: the retired lecturer John Bird
Revelations of significant budget overruns and data loss in the case of the Pro-Brexit campaign is also in Trouble: “We know that against the Constitution have been violated, and that the Referendum was cheated,” says a farmer of Ashton. “If you allow people to violate the Constitution, and in elections to cheat, then you get promoted and we get more of it.”
The debate will be more aggressive
The mood in the United Kingdom is tense, that much is clear. And the concern over an increasingly aggressive tone in public debate is growing. In October, a member of the “Sunday Times”, said Theresa May should bring to an important Meeting with members of “their own noose”. At the beginning of January then, right-wing demonstrators have insulted in front of the Parliament, the conservative MP Anna Soubry for the EU membership, as a “Nazi” and “liar”.
“The murder of Jo Cox (the house of deputies was murdered a week before the Brexit vote in 2016 by a right-wing fanatic. Note. d. Red.), the incident with Anna Soubry – all this violence is legitimised as a kind of Patriotism,” says the retired Bird. “I vacillate between cautious optimism and a great fear that things in this country for a while really bad. And then you will blame the foreigners and all who are not ‘patriots’. And the one that initiated the Whole, squirm, undoubtedly, from the responsibility.”