What is the protection of the Constitution knew about the bombers from the Berlin Christmas market? Because the Federal government prevents the questioning of a key witness, is now suing. To the right, says Marcel Fürstenau.
With this load, raced anise Amri car at 19. December 2016 the Christmas market on Berlin’s Breitscheidplatz
It was the worst Islamist, and that it was a motivated attack in Germany. Eleven people died as a Anis Amri at 19. December 2016, with a truck in the Christmas market on Berlin’s Breitscheidplatz raced. The driver of the stolen vehicle he had murdered before. The then President of the Federal office for the protection of the Constitution (BfV), Hans-Georg Maassen, described the terrible fact, at that time succinctly as a “police case”. Should be called: His authority, have little know nothing at all about the as a refugee to Germany travelled Amri.
This statement – formulated in a carefully – a gross understatement, you can easily prove. Strictly speaking, the note that Amri was led by the German safety authorities as a so-called threat is enough. So, as someone who one trusts at any time a Terror attack. And because of that, also addressed the Joint terrorism defence centre (GTAZ) of the Federal government and the länder with Amri. The regular meetings took and takes part, also, of course, the BfV.
The protection of the Constitution knows more than he’s letting on publicly
Because of the many open questions and contradictions, the Opposition urged the Bundestag to a Committee of inquiry. Was used in March and has since conducted numerous interviews with witnesses, also from the BfV. To have brought consistently to the impression, the name of Amri’s best if times. The supposed ignorance, especially of the deputies from the Opposition a little credible.
Marcel Fürstenau is observed for the DW to the Amri Committee of inquiry
Your doubts are well understood, because of the protection of the Constitution had Amris, contrary to his original presentation, very well Snitch in the environment. It is unclear how close these so-called V-men at the assassin. At best, the immediate contact person of knowledge in the protection of the Constitution, so the V-man leader. However, the may statements at the behest of the Federal government, not as a witness before the Committee. The Justification: A Source Of Protection.
The Opposition has good arguments
As “sources” be a Snitch. With their allegedly endangered the safety state Agencies to justify their own lack of cooperation. In fact, you are sabotaging the further clarification of the terrorist attack on the Berlin Christmas market. It’s nice to see the opposition factions of the Left, the Greens and the FDP. You can not continue with flimsy justifications to be given the run around and complain now before the constitutional court against the refusal attitude of the government.
Their arguments are convincing. The elucidation of matters of interest to the Public, and above all, the surviving victims and the families of victims. How absurd the bogus argument of the vulnerable security is shown with the example of the Terror group “national socialist underground” (NSU). Both in parliamentary committees of inquiry as well as in the NSU-process had to statements V-people and their leaders as witnesses. In order to disguise their identity, disguised themselves, some with wigs and sunglasses.
Once a traitor, always a traitor
That these witnesses were at the time of their statements to not more than V-the people or the leader is active, plays no role. Because in the eyes of religious or racist fanatics, there is no difference between active and former Spies and their Contacts in the protection of the Constitution. Once a traitor, always a traitor to this logic, Islamists follow the extremists as well as law. If the state is disabled out of fear of their possible revenge for the investigation of crimes, is more than questionable. Well, that Free Democrats, Left and Green to fight back with the full force of the law.