A majority of Members of parliament has is behind a movement against the proposed downloadverbod colleagues. Also a movement against the blocking of the access to piraterijwebsites received sufficient votes of the Second Chamber.
Earlier this week, were Members of parliament, their motions in relation to the amendments of the copyright policy, such as state secretary Teeven of Security and Justice, which represents. From an earlier survey and from the discussion of the plans showed that a majority of the parties against the downloadverbod. The Mps have now officially against the intention expressed by a motion of a Party, PVV, PvdA, and the Party for the Animals.
In the motion the parties declare that they have a downloadverbod inconsistent with a free and open internet, that the the privacy of internet users are affected and that the parties gives the chance to individual citizens. Also would citizens not be allowed to be impeded in receiving information. Teeven should therefore refrain from downloadverbod and have to find alternatives to the legal offer to promote.
Despite the fact that the motion is adopted, it is unlikely that the intention for a downloadverbod of the table. Teeven had already know your foot down and with the parties to try to reach about the conditions under which a ban would be acceptable is found.
A Kamermeerderheid of Party for the Animals, PVV, SP, GroenLinks, D66 and PvdA also voted for a motion by Kees Verhoeven of the Dutch political party D66. The parties agree that this from against Teevens proposal to make it possible for copyright holders to blockades to demand from the sites that auteursrechtinbreuken facilitate. In the motion state that the measure is freedom of expression too much of anything, the privacy of the user affected, the innovation is limited and isps to police officer.